Comparison of toxicities between Cisplatin-Etoposide versus Paclitaxel-Carboplatin regimen along with thoracic radiotherapy in unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

<b>Background</b>: Combined modality of treatment i.e., platinum-based doublet chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the optimal chemotherapy regimen to use with radiotherapy is still not established. Aim of this study was to compare the acute toxicities between cisplatin-etoposide (EP) and paclitaxel-carboplatin (PC) along with thoracic radiotherapy in unresectable locally advanced NSCLC. <b>Materials and Methods</b>: A Quasi-experimental study was conducted from October 2020 to September 2021 at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU) and National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital (NICR&amp;H), Dhaka. Patients with unresectable, locally advanced NSCLC who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled and distributed equally into two arms. Patients received thoracic radiotherapy with 60Gy in 2Gy daily fractions, 5 fractions a week, for 6 weeks with either Injection Cisplatin 50 mg/m2 administered on days 1, 8, 29, and 36, and Injection Etoposide 50 mg/m2/day on days 1–5 and 29–33 (Arm A), or Injection Carboplatin (AUC-2) and Injection Paclitaxel (45 mg/m2) administered on day 1, weekly, over a 6-week period (Arm B). All the patients were evaluated before, during, and after the completion of the treatment. Follow ups were done at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks following the completion of treatment using history, clinical examination and investigations. <b>Results</b>: most commonly observed toxicities were nausea, esophagitis and radiation pneumonitis. Although grade 1 esophagitis was more in arm B (56.76% vs 35.14%), grade 2 and 3 esophagitis were more in arm A (40.54% vs 16.21%; and 13.51% vs 5.41% respectively; p 0.043). Grade 1 pneumonitis was same (16 or 43.24%) in both arms. However, Grade 2 and 3 radiation pneumonitis were significantly more in Arm B (40.54% vs 16.22% and 5.41% vs 2.7 % respectively; p 0.004). Observed differences in nausea, vomiting, dermatitis, neurotoxicity, and hematological toxicities were not found to be statistically significant. <b>Conclusion</b>: This study suggests that the toxicities of cisplatin-etoposide regimen is comparable to paclitaxel-carboplatin regimen when given with concurrent radiotherapy in unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26924329
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of toxicities between Cisplatin-Etoposide versus Paclitaxel-Carboplatin regimen along with thoracic radiotherapy in unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Shourov Biswas, Janaki Parajuli, Mohammad Jahan Shams, Md Masudur Rahman et al.
SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Comparison of toxicities between Cisplatin-Etoposide versus Paclitaxel-Carboplatin regimen along with thoracic radiotherapy in unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Shourov Biswas, Janaki Parajuli, Mohammad Jahan Shams, Md Masudur Rahman, Mostafa Sanaul Haque
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Combined modality of treatment i.e., platinum-based doublet chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the optimal chemotherapy regimen to use with radiotherapy is still not established. Aim of this study was to compare the acute toxicities between cisplatin-etoposide (EP) and paclitaxel-carboplatin (PC) along with thoracic radiotherapy in unresectable locally advanced NSCLC. <b>Materials and Methods</b>: A Quasi-experimental study was conducted from October 2020 to September 2021 at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU) and National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital (NICR&amp;H), Dhaka. Patients with unresectable, locally advanced NSCLC who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled and distributed equally into two arms. Patients received thoracic radiotherapy with 60Gy in 2Gy daily fractions, 5 fractions a week, for 6 weeks with either Injection Cisplatin 50 mg/m2 administered on days 1, 8, 29, and 36, and Injection Etoposide 50 mg/m2/day on days 1–5 and 29–33 (Arm A), or Injection Carboplatin (AUC-2) and Injection Paclitaxel (45 mg/m2) administered on day 1, weekly, over a 6-week period (Arm B). All the patients were evaluated before, during, and after the completion of the treatment. Follow ups were done at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks following the completion of treatment using history, clinical examination and investigations. <b>Results</b>: most commonly observed toxicities were nausea, esophagitis and radiation pneumonitis. Although grade 1 esophagitis was more in arm B (56.76% vs 35.14%), grade 2 and 3 esophagitis were more in arm A (40.54% vs 16.21%; and 13.51% vs 5.41% respectively; p 0.043). Grade 1 pneumonitis was same (16 or 43.24%) in both arms. However, Grade 2 and 3 radiation pneumonitis were significantly more in Arm B (40.54% vs 16.22% and 5.41% vs 2.7 % respectively; p 0.004). Observed differences in nausea, vomiting, dermatitis, neurotoxicity, and hematological toxicities were not found to be statistically significant. <b>Conclusion</b>: This study suggests that the toxicities of cisplatin-etoposide regimen is comparable to paclitaxel-carboplatin regimen when given with concurrent radiotherapy in unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository
Bangladesh Medical University (BD)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.