Mirages or miracles? Lithium extraction and the just energy transition

Achieving a 1.5 °C global temperature limit by 2050 has heightened the need for lithium extraction for energy storage. This is touted by governments and industry as essential to a clean, just energy transition. However, critiques reveal tensions between this ideal and the realities of lithium extraction, questioning whether it represents a continuation of extractive capitalism or a pathway to sustainable development grounded in social and environmental justice. Our critical review of the literature synthesizes lithium supply chain dynamics and interdisciplinary critiques of lithium extractivism. It exposes the contradictions and challenges in relying on lithium for climate solutions. Key issues include high water usage, toxic waste, CO₂ emissions, and deepening global inequalities along racial and class lines. We argue that meaningful reform requires both local engagement with affected communities, especially Indigenous groups, and robust state policies to democratize the extraction process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103862
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.55

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mirages or miracles? Lithium extraction and the just energy transition

Gerardo Otero, Carmel Dowling
12 citations
Energy Research & Social Science
Extraction and Separation Processes
2.55
article

Mirages or miracles? Lithium extraction and the just energy transition

Gerardo Otero, Carmel Dowling
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Achieving a 1.5 °C global temperature limit by 2050 has heightened the need for lithium extraction for energy storage. This is touted by governments and industry as essential to a clean, just energy transition. However, critiques reveal tensions between this ideal and the realities of lithium extraction, questioning whether it represents a continuation of extractive capitalism or a pathway to sustainable development grounded in social and environmental justice. Our critical review of the literature synthesizes lithium supply chain dynamics and interdisciplinary critiques of lithium extractivism. It exposes the contradictions and challenges in relying on lithium for climate solutions. Key issues include high water usage, toxic waste, CO₂ emissions, and deepening global inequalities along racial and class lines. We argue that meaningful reform requires both local engagement with affected communities, especially Indigenous groups, and robust state policies to democratize the extraction process.

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 119
Simon Fraser University (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Extraction and Separation Processes
2.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mirages or miracles? Lithium extraction and the just energy transition — Gerardo Otero, Carmel Dowling · Energy Research & Social Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS