Ounomata and Epōnymiai:

This article re-examines various passages from the second book of Herodotus’ Histories concerning the origins of the divine names. It is argued that the distinction between οὔνομα and ἐπωνυμίη is not between theonym and epithet, but between a word which insists on the function of the name, to identify, and a word which highlights its etymology. When Herodotus writes that most divine οὐνόματα came to Greece from Egypt, he probably means that the Greeks first heard about the gods and learnt their names from the Egyptians, who may have learnt these names from the gods themselves. The Greeks then adapted the names to their own language, while maintaining the general ideas expressed by them. Herodotus’ statement that Hesiod and Homer gave the gods their ἐπωνυμίαι is analysed in the context of Histories 2.53. It is argued that these ἐπωνυμίαι are poetic names reflecting the characteristics of the gods and inspired by the Muses, and that the verb δίδωμι (‘to give’) indicates that they were given as offerings to the gods by the poets. Passages 2.3, on human knowledge of divine matters and names, and 2.4, about the Twelve Gods, are also discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48638/sylgs.2024.1.108169
Primary Topic
Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ounomata and Epōnymiai:

Alaya Palamidis
SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository
Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
article

Ounomata and Epōnymiai:

Alaya Palamidis
article en

Abstract

This article re-examines various passages from the second book of Herodotus’ Histories concerning the origins of the divine names. It is argued that the distinction between οὔνομα and ἐπωνυμίη is not between theonym and epithet, but between a word which insists on the function of the name, to identify, and a word which highlights its etymology. When Herodotus writes that most divine οὐνόματα came to Greece from Egypt, he probably means that the Greeks first heard about the gods and learnt their names from the Egyptians, who may have learnt these names from the gods themselves. The Greeks then adapted the names to their own language, while maintaining the general ideas expressed by them. Herodotus’ statement that Hesiod and Homer gave the gods their ἐπωνυμίαι is analysed in the context of Histories 2.53. It is argued that these ἐπωνυμίαι are poetic names reflecting the characteristics of the gods and inspired by the Muses, and that the verb δίδωμι (‘to give’) indicates that they were given as offerings to the gods by the poets. Passages 2.3, on human knowledge of divine matters and names, and 2.4, about the Twelve Gods, are also discussed.

SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository
Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (FR)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.