Using accelerometry tags to quantify gray whale foraging behavior

Abstract High‐resolution tri‐axial accelerometry biologging tags have quantitatively described behaviors in baleen whale species that forage using lunges and continuous ram filtration. However, detailed quantitative descriptions of foraging behaviors do not exist for gray whales, a unique baleen whale species that primarily uses benthic suction feeding with a rolling component. We deployed suction cup biologging tags on Pacific Coast Feeding Group (PCFG) gray whales to quantify foraging behavior at the broad state (dive) and foraging tactic (roll event) scales. Hidden Markov models were used to describe three distinct states using turn angle, dive duration, pseudotrack tortuosity, and presence of roll events that can be interpreted as forage, search, and transit behavior. Classification and Regression Tree models best described foraging tactics (headstands, benthic digs, and side swims) using median pitch, depth to total length ratio, and absolute value of the median roll. On average, PCFG gray whales spent more time searching and performed more left‐rolled foraging tactics at shallower depths at night compared to during the day, potentially to track prey above them in the water column. Describing foraging behavior in PCFG gray whales enables examination of links between behavioral budgets, energetics, and the physiological impact of threats facing this group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marine Mammal Science
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.13210
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Marine animal studies overview
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using accelerometry tags to quantify gray whale foraging behavior

Andrew W. Trites, John Calambokidis, K. C. Bierlich, David E. Cade et al.
3 citations
Marine Mammal Science
Marine animal studies overview
1.38
article

Using accelerometry tags to quantify gray whale foraging behavior

Andrew W. Trites, John Calambokidis, K. C. Bierlich, David E. Cade, Leigh G. Torres, Alejandro Fernández Ajó, Leslie New, Clara N. Bird, Lisa Hildebrand, Enrico Pirotta, Kate M. Colson
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract High‐resolution tri‐axial accelerometry biologging tags have quantitatively described behaviors in baleen whale species that forage using lunges and continuous ram filtration. However, detailed quantitative descriptions of foraging behaviors do not exist for gray whales, a unique baleen whale species that primarily uses benthic suction feeding with a rolling component. We deployed suction cup biologging tags on Pacific Coast Feeding Group (PCFG) gray whales to quantify foraging behavior at the broad state (dive) and foraging tactic (roll event) scales. Hidden Markov models were used to describe three distinct states using turn angle, dive duration, pseudotrack tortuosity, and presence of roll events that can be interpreted as forage, search, and transit behavior. Classification and Regression Tree models best described foraging tactics (headstands, benthic digs, and side swims) using median pitch, depth to total length ratio, and absolute value of the median roll. On average, PCFG gray whales spent more time searching and performed more left‐rolled foraging tactics at shallower depths at night compared to during the day, potentially to track prey above them in the water column. Describing foraging behavior in PCFG gray whales enables examination of links between behavioral budgets, energetics, and the physiological impact of threats facing this group.

Marine Mammal ScienceVol. 41(2)
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (US), Oregon State University (US), Fisheries and Oceans Canada (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), University of St Andrews (GB), Ursinus College (US), Pacific University (US), Cascadia Research Collective (US), Stanford University (US)
Washington State University, Oregon State University, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Office of Naval Research, Southwest Fisheries Science Center
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Marine animal studies overview
1.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.