Tackling precarious work through work and organizational psychology: it’s work but not as we know it

Scholarly research interest in precarious work is on the rise; however, contributions from Work and Organisational Psychology (WOP) remain in their infancy. This may be because precarious work often exists outside of traditional workplaces, which are the mainstay of WOP research and practice. Presenting a case for the importance of a WOP perspective on precarious work, we draw on historical developments on the topic and highlight key areas for WOP contribution. We illustrate the importance of a multilevel and contextualised conceptualisation of precarious work, which can only be understood through multi-stakeholder collaboration (praxis). We propose a need for radical and transformative structural change, which centres on human values and highlights the subjective experiences of affected people, their families, and communities. In doing so we aim to stimulate future WOP research and practice that impacts policy and shapes work in a way that enhances the social good.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2024.2433489
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tackling precarious work through work and organizational psychology: it’s work but not as we know it

Christian Seubert, Lisa Seubert, David L. Blustein, Blake A. Allan et al.
13 citations
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Employment and Welfare Studies
11.04
article

Tackling precarious work through work and organizational psychology: it’s work but not as we know it

Christian Seubert, Lisa Seubert, David L. Blustein, Blake A. Allan, Joanna Wilde, Rosalind Searle, Ishbel McWha‐Hermann
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Scholarly research interest in precarious work is on the rise; however, contributions from Work and Organisational Psychology (WOP) remain in their infancy. This may be because precarious work often exists outside of traditional workplaces, which are the mainstay of WOP research and practice. Presenting a case for the importance of a WOP perspective on precarious work, we draw on historical developments on the topic and highlight key areas for WOP contribution. We illustrate the importance of a multilevel and contextualised conceptualisation of precarious work, which can only be understood through multi-stakeholder collaboration (praxis). We propose a need for radical and transformative structural change, which centres on human values and highlights the subjective experiences of affected people, their families, and communities. In doing so we aim to stimulate future WOP research and practice that impacts policy and shapes work in a way that enhances the social good.

European Journal of Work and Organizational PsychologyVol. 34(1)
Boston College (US), Universität Innsbruck (AT), Oldham Council (GB), University of Houston (US), Adam Smith Institute (GB), University of Glasgow (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Employment and Welfare Studies
11.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.