Enhancing the resilience of intercropping systems to changing moisture conditions in Africa through the integration of grain legumes: A meta-analysis

Africa faces significant challenges due to climate change, which jeopardizes food security and the livelihoods of smallholder farmers who rely heavily on rain-fed agriculture. Although crop diversification has the potential to enhance resilience against climate variability, determining the optimal species compositions and agronomic practices for varying moisture conditions remains a significant challenge, despite extensive research efforts across the continent. This paper aims to evaluate the effectiveness of various intercropping systems and agronomic practices in response to changing moisture conditions, with the objective of enhancing smallholder resilience to climate change. We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of existing studies ( n = 1448) on intercropping systems in Africa, focusing on performance indicators such as the land equivalent ratio (LER), transgressive overyielding index (TOI), complementarity effect, and competition intensity. These indicators were evaluated in relation to moisture variability, quantified using the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI). The results reveal that moisture variability had a significant impact on intercropping performance and resource use. Intercropping consistently outperformed sole cropping, with an average TOI of 1.01 and LER of 1.45. Integrating grain legumes into intercropping systems enhanced performance and resource use by at least 11.5 % across all moisture conditions. The greatest benefits of legume integration were observed in root and tuber cropping systems (+78 % LER and +27 % TOI) compared to cereal-based systems (+39 % LER and +1 % TOI). This enhancement was attributed to reduced competition and stronger complementarity, particularly under drier conditions. Overall, our results indicate that legume-based intercropping systems are more resilient to moisture variability compared to non-legume systems, offering greater stability and productivity as moisture conditions fluctuate. Our findings indicate that integrating grain legumes into intercropping systems is an effective strategy to enhance agricultural resilience in Africa. However, the effectiveness of such systems is dependent on specific moisture levels, highlighting the necessity of selecting optimal crop combinations and agronomic practices to maximize benefits. This study offers valuable insights for policymakers, researchers, and farmers on the benefits of integrating grain legumes into root and tuber cropping systems as a low-hanging fruit climate-smart agricultural practice in Africa. Future research should focus on the long-term impacts and scalability of these practices. • Variability in moisture conditions affects the performance of intercropping systems. • Roots and tubers systems are less affected compared to cereal-based intercropping. • Legume integration enhances system performance under variable moisture conditions. • Legume benefits are related to competition relaxation and complementarity effect. • Good agronomic practices must be considered under different moisture regimes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Field Crops Research
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109663
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing the resilience of intercropping systems to changing moisture conditions in Africa through the integration of grain legumes: A meta-analysis

Frank Rasche, Eric Koomson, Adam Muhammad Adam, Georg Cadisch et al.
10 citations
Field Crops Research
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
5.68
article

Enhancing the resilience of intercropping systems to changing moisture conditions in Africa through the integration of grain legumes: A meta-analysis

Frank Rasche, Eric Koomson, Adam Muhammad Adam, Georg Cadisch, Léonard Rusinamhodzi, K.E. Giller, Carsten Marohn
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Africa faces significant challenges due to climate change, which jeopardizes food security and the livelihoods of smallholder farmers who rely heavily on rain-fed agriculture. Although crop diversification has the potential to enhance resilience against climate variability, determining the optimal species compositions and agronomic practices for varying moisture conditions remains a significant challenge, despite extensive research efforts across the continent. This paper aims to evaluate the effectiveness of various intercropping systems and agronomic practices in response to changing moisture conditions, with the objective of enhancing smallholder resilience to climate change. We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of existing studies ( n = 1448) on intercropping systems in Africa, focusing on performance indicators such as the land equivalent ratio (LER), transgressive overyielding index (TOI), complementarity effect, and competition intensity. These indicators were evaluated in relation to moisture variability, quantified using the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI). The results reveal that moisture variability had a significant impact on intercropping performance and resource use. Intercropping consistently outperformed sole cropping, with an average TOI of 1.01 and LER of 1.45. Integrating grain legumes into intercropping systems enhanced performance and resource use by at least 11.5 % across all moisture conditions. The greatest benefits of legume integration were observed in root and tuber cropping systems (+78 % LER and +27 % TOI) compared to cereal-based systems (+39 % LER and +1 % TOI). This enhancement was attributed to reduced competition and stronger complementarity, particularly under drier conditions. Overall, our results indicate that legume-based intercropping systems are more resilient to moisture variability compared to non-legume systems, offering greater stability and productivity as moisture conditions fluctuate. Our findings indicate that integrating grain legumes into intercropping systems is an effective strategy to enhance agricultural resilience in Africa. However, the effectiveness of such systems is dependent on specific moisture levels, highlighting the necessity of selecting optimal crop combinations and agronomic practices to maximize benefits. This study offers valuable insights for policymakers, researchers, and farmers on the benefits of integrating grain legumes into root and tuber cropping systems as a low-hanging fruit climate-smart agricultural practice in Africa. Future research should focus on the long-term impacts and scalability of these practices. • Variability in moisture conditions affects the performance of intercropping systems. • Roots and tubers systems are less affected compared to cereal-based intercropping. • Legume integration enhances system performance under variable moisture conditions. • Legume benefits are related to competition relaxation and complementarity effect. • Good agronomic practices must be considered under different moisture regimes.

Field Crops ResearchVol. 321
University of Hohenheim (DE), Julius Kühn-Institut (DE), Graduate School Experimental Plant Sciences (NL), International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (KE), International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (BI), International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (NG), Bayero University Kano (NG)
European Commission, Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
5.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.