Location and orientation united graph comparison for topographic point cloud change estimation

3D topographic point cloud change estimation produces fundamental inputs for understanding Earth surface process dynamics. In general, change estimation aims at detecting the largest possible number of points with significance ( i.e., difference > uncertainty) and quantifying multiple types of topographic changes. However, several complex factors, including the inhomogeneous nature of point cloud data, the high uncertainty in positional changes, and the different types of quantifying difference, pose challenges for the reliable detection and quantification of 3D topographic changes. To address these limitations, the paper proposes a graph comparison-based method to estimate 3D topographic change from point clouds. First, a graph with both location and orientation representation is designed to aggregate local neighbors of topographic point clouds against the disordered and unstructured data nature. Second, the corresponding graphs between two topographic point clouds are identified and compared to quantify the differences and associated uncertainties in both location and orientation features. Particularly, the proposed method unites the significant changes derived from both features ( i.e., location and orientation) and captures the location difference ( i.e., distance) and the orientation difference ( i.e., rotation) for each point with significant change. We tested the proposed method in a mountain region (Sellrain, Tyrol, Austria) covered by three airborne laser scanning point cloud pairs with different point densities and complex topographic changes at intervals of four, six, and ten years. Our method detected significant changes in 91.39 % − 93.03 % of the study area, while a state-of-the-art method ( i.e., Multiscale Model-to-Model Cloud Comparison, M3C2) identified 36.81 % − 47.41 % significant changes for the same area. Especially for unchanged building roofs, our method measured lower change magnitudes than M3C2. Looking at the case of shallow landslides, our method identified 84 out of a total of 88 reference landslides by analysing change in distance or rotation. Therefore, our method not only detects a large number of significant changes but also quantifies two types of topographic changes ( i.e., distance and rotation), and is more robust against registration errors. It shows large potential for estimation and interpretation of topographic changes in natural environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2024.11.016
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Location and orientation united graph comparison for topographic point cloud change estimation

Chun Liu, Lotte de Vugt, Shoujun Jia, Andreas Mayr et al.
2 citations
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
0.41
article

Location and orientation united graph comparison for topographic point cloud change estimation

Chun Liu, Lotte de Vugt, Shoujun Jia, Andreas Mayr, Martin Rutzinger
article en
2 citations

Abstract

3D topographic point cloud change estimation produces fundamental inputs for understanding Earth surface process dynamics. In general, change estimation aims at detecting the largest possible number of points with significance ( i.e., difference > uncertainty) and quantifying multiple types of topographic changes. However, several complex factors, including the inhomogeneous nature of point cloud data, the high uncertainty in positional changes, and the different types of quantifying difference, pose challenges for the reliable detection and quantification of 3D topographic changes. To address these limitations, the paper proposes a graph comparison-based method to estimate 3D topographic change from point clouds. First, a graph with both location and orientation representation is designed to aggregate local neighbors of topographic point clouds against the disordered and unstructured data nature. Second, the corresponding graphs between two topographic point clouds are identified and compared to quantify the differences and associated uncertainties in both location and orientation features. Particularly, the proposed method unites the significant changes derived from both features ( i.e., location and orientation) and captures the location difference ( i.e., distance) and the orientation difference ( i.e., rotation) for each point with significant change. We tested the proposed method in a mountain region (Sellrain, Tyrol, Austria) covered by three airborne laser scanning point cloud pairs with different point densities and complex topographic changes at intervals of four, six, and ten years. Our method detected significant changes in 91.39 % − 93.03 % of the study area, while a state-of-the-art method ( i.e., Multiscale Model-to-Model Cloud Comparison, M3C2) identified 36.81 % − 47.41 % significant changes for the same area. Especially for unchanged building roofs, our method measured lower change magnitudes than M3C2. Looking at the case of shallow landslides, our method identified 84 out of a total of 88 reference landslides by analysing change in distance or rotation. Therefore, our method not only detects a large number of significant changes but also quantifies two types of topographic changes ( i.e., distance and rotation), and is more robust against registration errors. It shows large potential for estimation and interpretation of topographic changes in natural environments.

ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote SensingVol. 219
Tongji University (CN), Universität Innsbruck (AT)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Tiroler Wissenschaftsförderung
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
0.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.