Levene's Test for Verifying Homoscedasticity Between Groups in Quasi-Experiments in Social Sciences

One of the most used quantitative research designs in the social sciences field is the quasi-experiment with an experimental group and a control group. Its widespread use can be explained, on one hand, by the fact that this design offers greater internal control than pre-experimental designs, which lack a control group. On the other hand, it poses fewer methodological challenges compared to true experiments, whose operational demands often exceed or do not align with the natural behavior of groups in educational populations. Given its prevalence in research studies, it is important to highlight that one of the weaknesses of this design lies precisely in the determination of the treatment and control groups. These groups are often selected based on the researcher's convenience or even inferred through common sense, that is, without a scientifically valid criterion. To address this issue, this article presents Levene's test as an option for verifying homoscedasticity between these two groups, which can contribute to methodological rigor in this aspect that substantially impacts the internal validity of the research findings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
South Eastern European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70135/seejph.vi.2342
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Levene's Test for Verifying Homoscedasticity Between Groups in Quasi-Experiments in Social Sciences

César Augusto Cardeña Ojeda
3 citations
South Eastern European Journal of Public Health
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
3.40
article

Levene's Test for Verifying Homoscedasticity Between Groups in Quasi-Experiments in Social Sciences

César Augusto Cardeña Ojeda
article en
3 citations

Abstract

One of the most used quantitative research designs in the social sciences field is the quasi-experiment with an experimental group and a control group. Its widespread use can be explained, on one hand, by the fact that this design offers greater internal control than pre-experimental designs, which lack a control group. On the other hand, it poses fewer methodological challenges compared to true experiments, whose operational demands often exceed or do not align with the natural behavior of groups in educational populations. Given its prevalence in research studies, it is important to highlight that one of the weaknesses of this design lies precisely in the determination of the treatment and control groups. These groups are often selected based on the researcher's convenience or even inferred through common sense, that is, without a scientifically valid criterion. To address this issue, this article presents Levene's test as an option for verifying homoscedasticity between these two groups, which can contribute to methodological rigor in this aspect that substantially impacts the internal validity of the research findings.

South Eastern European Journal of Public Health
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Levene's Test for Verifying Homoscedasticity Between Groups in Quasi-Experiments in Social Sciences — César Augusto Cardeña Ojeda · South Eastern European Journal of Public Health (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS