Public Opinion, Immigration Enforcement, and Donald Trump: A Micro-Level Analysis

This study examines the variables that influence public opinion regarding immigration enforcement in the United States during a period of heightened anti-immigration sentiments and policies. Specifically, this study investigates the factors that contributed to public support for or against police stops aimed at undocumented immigrants during the Trump presidency. By focusing on undocumented immigrants rather than the entire spectrum of immigrants, this study makes a unique contribution to the existing literature. To achieve this objective, this research used public opinion data across all 50 states in the United States and employed binary logistic regression analysis on the data. The results indicate that political ideology, party identification, region, and education significantly decreased the likelihood of public support for immigration enforcement against undocumented immigrants. On the other hand, age significantly increases public support for immigration enforcement. The findings partially support the assumptions of the group threat and conflict theories, and the study discusses the theoretical and policy implications of these results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Behavioral Scientist
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642241300936
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public Opinion, Immigration Enforcement, and Donald Trump: A Micro-Level Analysis

Michael K. Dzordzormenyoh
2 citations
American Behavioral Scientist
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
2.26
article

Public Opinion, Immigration Enforcement, and Donald Trump: A Micro-Level Analysis

Michael K. Dzordzormenyoh
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study examines the variables that influence public opinion regarding immigration enforcement in the United States during a period of heightened anti-immigration sentiments and policies. Specifically, this study investigates the factors that contributed to public support for or against police stops aimed at undocumented immigrants during the Trump presidency. By focusing on undocumented immigrants rather than the entire spectrum of immigrants, this study makes a unique contribution to the existing literature. To achieve this objective, this research used public opinion data across all 50 states in the United States and employed binary logistic regression analysis on the data. The results indicate that political ideology, party identification, region, and education significantly decreased the likelihood of public support for immigration enforcement against undocumented immigrants. On the other hand, age significantly increases public support for immigration enforcement. The findings partially support the assumptions of the group threat and conflict theories, and the study discusses the theoretical and policy implications of these results.

American Behavioral Scientist
Kent State University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.