Beyond Cultural Narratives: A Data-Driven Analysis of How Citizens Define Successful Integration

Amid ongoing debates over integration failures in Europe, this article examines an important yet understudied area: public perceptions of integration. Previous studies have largely focused on isolated aspects of public opinion, especially cultural elements, offering limited insights into how citizens define successful integration and perceive policy shortcomings. This article expands the scope with a data-driven, two-step approach that enables an open exploration of integration attitudes, unconstrained by predefined categories. Using open-ended responses, it captures citizens’ views on what they deem essential for successful integration, while latent class analysis is applied to identify distinct groups with shared perspectives. Substantively, the analysis provides insights into the diverse nature of public opinion on integration, challenging oversimplified measures and bringing to light previously overlooked patterns. Methodologically, it offers a flexible framework for examining public opinion, forming a basis for future cross-country comparisons seeking to enhance our understanding of public sentiment on integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Studies Review
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299241297801
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Cultural Narratives: A Data-Driven Analysis of How Citizens Define Successful Integration

Elina Lindgren
2 citations
Political Studies Review
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
2.26
article

Beyond Cultural Narratives: A Data-Driven Analysis of How Citizens Define Successful Integration

Elina Lindgren
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Amid ongoing debates over integration failures in Europe, this article examines an important yet understudied area: public perceptions of integration. Previous studies have largely focused on isolated aspects of public opinion, especially cultural elements, offering limited insights into how citizens define successful integration and perceive policy shortcomings. This article expands the scope with a data-driven, two-step approach that enables an open exploration of integration attitudes, unconstrained by predefined categories. Using open-ended responses, it captures citizens’ views on what they deem essential for successful integration, while latent class analysis is applied to identify distinct groups with shared perspectives. Substantively, the analysis provides insights into the diverse nature of public opinion on integration, challenging oversimplified measures and bringing to light previously overlooked patterns. Methodologically, it offers a flexible framework for examining public opinion, forming a basis for future cross-country comparisons seeking to enhance our understanding of public sentiment on integration.

Political Studies ReviewVol. 23(3)
University of Gothenburg (SE)
Göteborgs Universitet
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.