Initial experience in implementing quantitative DCE-MRI to predict breast cancer therapy response in a multi-center and multi-vendor platform setting

Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI as a promising method for the prediction of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been demonstrated mostly in single-center and single-vendor platform studies. This preliminary study reports the initial experience in implementing quantitative breast DCE-MRI in multi-center (MC) and multi-vendor platform (MP) settings to predict NAC response. MRI data, including B<sub>1</sub> mapping, variable flip angle (VFA) measurements of native tissue R<sub>1</sub> (R<sub>1,0</sub>), and DCE-MRI, were acquired during NAC at three sites using 3T systems with Siemens, Philips, and GE platforms, respectively. High spatiotemporal resolution DCE-MRI was performed using similar vendor product sequences with k-space undersampling during acquisition and view sharing during reconstruction. A breast phantom was used for quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) across sites. The Tofts model (TM) and shutter-speed model (SSM) were used for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of the DCE data. Additionally, tumor region of interest (ROI)- <i>vs</i>. voxel-based analyses in combination with the use of VFA-measured R<sub>1,0</sub> <i>vs</i>. fixed, literature-reported R<sub>1,0</sub> were investigated to determine the optimal analysis approach. Results from 15 patients who completed the study are reported. Voxel-based PK analysis using fixed R<sub>1,0</sub> was deemed the optimal approach, which allowed the inclusion of data from one vendor platform where VFA measurements produced ≥100% overestimation of R<sub>1,0</sub>. The semi-quantitative signal enhancement ratio (SER) and quantitative PK parameters outperformed the tumor longest diameter (LD) in the prediction of pathologic complete response (pCR) <i>vs.</i> non-pCR after the first NAC cycle, whereas K<sup>trans</sup> consistently provided more accurate predictions than both SER and LD after the first NAC cycle and at the NAC midpoint. Both TM and SSM K<sup>trans</sup> and k<sub>ep</sub> were excellent predictors of response at the NAC midpoint with ROC AUC >0.90, while the SSM parameters (AUC ≥0.80) performed better than their TM counterparts (AUC <0.80) after the first NAC cycle. The initial experience of this ongoing study indicates the importance of QA/QC using a phantom and suggests that deploying voxel-based PK analysis using a fixed R<sub>1,0</sub> may mitigate random errors from R<sub>1,0</sub> measurements across platforms and potentially eliminate the need for B<sub>1</sub> and VFA acquisitions in MC and MP trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1395502
Citations
3
Primary Topic
MRI in cancer diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Initial experience in implementing quantitative DCE-MRI to predict breast cancer therapy response in a multi-center and multi-vendor platform setting

Evthokia Hobbs, Debosmita Biswas, Su Kim, Jennifer M. Specht et al.
3 citations
Frontiers in Oncology
MRI in cancer diagnosis
1.21
article

Initial experience in implementing quantitative DCE-MRI to predict breast cancer therapy response in a multi-center and multi-vendor platform setting

Evthokia Hobbs, Debosmita Biswas, Su Kim, Jennifer M. Specht, Suzanne M. Dintzis, Anum S. Kazerouni, Michael Hirano, Habib Rahbar, Christian Wille, Mary Lynn Bryant, James H. Holmes, Travis Rice‐Stitt, Chelsea Pyle, Isabella Li, Sneha Phadke, Alexandra S. Zimmer, Nicole Margo Grogan Fleege, Amani Bashir, Alina Tudorica, Assim Saad Eddin, Xin Li, Wei Huang, Savannah C. Partridge, Brendan Moloney, Jeong Youn Lim
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI as a promising method for the prediction of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been demonstrated mostly in single-center and single-vendor platform studies. This preliminary study reports the initial experience in implementing quantitative breast DCE-MRI in multi-center (MC) and multi-vendor platform (MP) settings to predict NAC response. MRI data, including B<sub>1</sub> mapping, variable flip angle (VFA) measurements of native tissue R<sub>1</sub> (R<sub>1,0</sub>), and DCE-MRI, were acquired during NAC at three sites using 3T systems with Siemens, Philips, and GE platforms, respectively. High spatiotemporal resolution DCE-MRI was performed using similar vendor product sequences with k-space undersampling during acquisition and view sharing during reconstruction. A breast phantom was used for quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) across sites. The Tofts model (TM) and shutter-speed model (SSM) were used for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of the DCE data. Additionally, tumor region of interest (ROI)- <i>vs</i>. voxel-based analyses in combination with the use of VFA-measured R<sub>1,0</sub> <i>vs</i>. fixed, literature-reported R<sub>1,0</sub> were investigated to determine the optimal analysis approach. Results from 15 patients who completed the study are reported. Voxel-based PK analysis using fixed R<sub>1,0</sub> was deemed the optimal approach, which allowed the inclusion of data from one vendor platform where VFA measurements produced ≥100% overestimation of R<sub>1,0</sub>. The semi-quantitative signal enhancement ratio (SER) and quantitative PK parameters outperformed the tumor longest diameter (LD) in the prediction of pathologic complete response (pCR) <i>vs.</i> non-pCR after the first NAC cycle, whereas K<sup>trans</sup> consistently provided more accurate predictions than both SER and LD after the first NAC cycle and at the NAC midpoint. Both TM and SSM K<sup>trans</sup> and k<sub>ep</sub> were excellent predictors of response at the NAC midpoint with ROC AUC >0.90, while the SSM parameters (AUC ≥0.80) performed better than their TM counterparts (AUC <0.80) after the first NAC cycle. The initial experience of this ongoing study indicates the importance of QA/QC using a phantom and suggests that deploying voxel-based PK analysis using a fixed R<sub>1,0</sub> may mitigate random errors from R<sub>1,0</sub> measurements across platforms and potentially eliminate the need for B<sub>1</sub> and VFA acquisitions in MC and MP trials.

Frontiers in OncologyVol. 14
University of Iowa (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US), University of Washington (US), University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), Advanced Imaging Research (United States) (US)
Oregon Health and Science University, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
MRI in cancer diagnosis
1.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.