Initial experience in implementing quantitative DCE-MRI to predict breast cancer therapy response in a multi-center and multi-vendor platform setting
Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI as a promising method for the prediction of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been demonstrated mostly in single-center and single-vendor platform studies. This preliminary study reports the initial experience in implementing quantitative breast DCE-MRI in multi-center (MC) and multi-vendor platform (MP) settings to predict NAC response. MRI data, including B<sub>1</sub> mapping, variable flip angle (VFA) measurements of native tissue R<sub>1</sub> (R<sub>1,0</sub>), and DCE-MRI, were acquired during NAC at three sites using 3T systems with Siemens, Philips, and GE platforms, respectively. High spatiotemporal resolution DCE-MRI was performed using similar vendor product sequences with k-space undersampling during acquisition and view sharing during reconstruction. A breast phantom was used for quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) across sites. The Tofts model (TM) and shutter-speed model (SSM) were used for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of the DCE data. Additionally, tumor region of interest (ROI)- <i>vs</i>. voxel-based analyses in combination with the use of VFA-measured R<sub>1,0</sub> <i>vs</i>. fixed, literature-reported R<sub>1,0</sub> were investigated to determine the optimal analysis approach. Results from 15 patients who completed the study are reported. Voxel-based PK analysis using fixed R<sub>1,0</sub> was deemed the optimal approach, which allowed the inclusion of data from one vendor platform where VFA measurements produced ≥100% overestimation of R<sub>1,0</sub>. The semi-quantitative signal enhancement ratio (SER) and quantitative PK parameters outperformed the tumor longest diameter (LD) in the prediction of pathologic complete response (pCR) <i>vs.</i> non-pCR after the first NAC cycle, whereas K<sup>trans</sup> consistently provided more accurate predictions than both SER and LD after the first NAC cycle and at the NAC midpoint. Both TM and SSM K<sup>trans</sup> and k<sub>ep</sub> were excellent predictors of response at the NAC midpoint with ROC AUC >0.90, while the SSM parameters (AUC ≥0.80) performed better than their TM counterparts (AUC <0.80) after the first NAC cycle. The initial experience of this ongoing study indicates the importance of QA/QC using a phantom and suggests that deploying voxel-based PK analysis using a fixed R<sub>1,0</sub> may mitigate random errors from R<sub>1,0</sub> measurements across platforms and potentially eliminate the need for B<sub>1</sub> and VFA acquisitions in MC and MP trials.
Authors
- Evthokia Hobbs (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7738-0131)
- Debosmita Biswas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0798-5637)
- Su Kim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2645-2844)
- Jennifer M. Specht (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1484-2113)
- Suzanne M. Dintzis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9762-030X)
- Anum S. Kazerouni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4200-534X)
- Michael Hirano
- Habib Rahbar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4835-1478)
- Christian Wille
- Mary Lynn Bryant
- James H. Holmes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0936-3700)
- Travis Rice‐Stitt
- Chelsea Pyle
- Isabella Li
- Sneha Phadke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9829-1066)
- Alexandra S. Zimmer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6789-0982)
- Nicole Margo Grogan Fleege (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9268-7070)
- Amani Bashir (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7239-3662)
- Alina Tudorica
- Assim Saad Eddin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8769-7311)
- Xin Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9283-3602)
- Wei Huang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3468-7467)
- Savannah C. Partridge
- Brendan Moloney
- Jeong Youn Lim
Institutions
- University of Iowa (US)
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (US)
- Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
- Advanced Imaging Research (United States) (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers in Oncology
- Published
- 2024-11-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1395502
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- MRI in cancer diagnosis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.21
Funders
- Oregon Health and Science University
- National Institutes of Health