Tips from an expert panel on the development of a clinical research protocol
A research protocol is a document that outlines the proposed research idea and is submitted to funding agencies, institutions, or journals for approval. Writing a research protocol represents a challenge, particularly for early-career researchers. In this guide, we aim to provide detailed guidance with the key components and offer practical tips for crafting a research protocol in line with the various study designs. Specifically, the structure of a research protocol should contain the following items: (1) a title that is specific, catchy, and impressive within the word limitation; (2) an abstract that briefs the critical points of the study; (3) an introduction highlighting the study context from broad to narrow and defining the knowledge gap; (4) a justification underlining the significance of the proposed study; (5) Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, and Time-bound (SMART) objective(s) and aim(s); (6) a methodology covering seven sub-items, including [i] study design and settings, [ii] study subjects, [iii] sample size calculation and sampling, [iv] participants recruitment and follow-up, [v] questionnaire development, [vi] potential variables and outcomes, and [vii] data analysis plan; (7) dissemination of the results; (8) ethics and conflict of interests; (9) budgets analysis/ funding disclosure; and (10) references. This guide will give an overview of these steps and provide clear and concise tips on how to successfully draft a scientific protocol. With careful planning and appropriate guidance, it is possible to develop a well-structured and compelling protocol to obtain approval for the conduction of the study or funding from agencies, institutions, or organizations.
Authors
- Sara S. Elsheikh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6053-9871)
- Atsuko Imoto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2744-6160)
- Omar M. Makram
- Randa Elsheikh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5811-9907)
- Yasuhiko Kamiya (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7190-1082)
- Nguyen Khoi Quan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3222-0978)
- Patrícia Takako Endo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9163-5583)
- Norio Ohmagari (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4622-8970)
- Abdelrahman M Makram (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2011-8092)
- Nguyen Tien Huy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9543-9440)
- Peter Lee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8244-1904)
- Hirotsugu Aiga (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5910-3379)
- Nguyen Tran Minh Duc (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9333-7539)
- Nguyen Hai Nam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5184-6936)
- Nguyen Thanh Van (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4596-7034)
- Ngoc Quynh Tram Nguyen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4114-4997)
- Gibson Omwansa Javes
Institutions
- University of Debrecen (HU)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Shiga University of Medical Science (JP)
- Duy Tan University (VN)
- Shiga University (JP)
- Zagazig University (EG)
- Augusta University (US)
- Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
- Cho Ray Hospital (VN)
- Online Technologies (United States) (US)
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- National Center for Global Health and Medicine (JP)
- Stadtkrankenhaus Schwabach (DE)
- VinUniversity (VN)
- Oxford University Clinical Research Unit (VN)
- P N Lee Statistics and Computing (United Kingdom) (GB)
- October 6 University (EG)
- Nagasaki University (JP)
- Universidade de Pernambuco (BR)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Published
- 2024-11-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02315-1
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.38