National Implementation of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: In Search of an Appropriate Modality

The implementation of the Rome Statute in the domestic sphere of each State party is crucial for achieving its ultimate purpose: to end impunity for perpetrators of heinous international crimes. The present paper aims to appraise various modalities for States to implement the Statute. It applies doctrinal legal research by analyzing the relevant provisions of the Rome Statute and evaluating the practice of selected States. The paper finds that the implementation modality primarily depends on whether the State is a monist or a dualist. Even in the same group of States, the details may vary depending on the constitutional law requirements. Several States enact the implementation legislation before adopting the Statute whereas other States do it only after joining the Statute. While many States adopt a single comprehensive legislation incorporating key obligations of the Statute, other States enact multiple legislation to implement the Statute. Yet some States follow the model law approach. After appraising the modalities, the paper concludes with recommendations for further improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Legal Spirit
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31328/ls.v8i3.6393
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

National Implementation of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: In Search of an Appropriate Modality

Abdul Ghafur Hamid
Legal Spirit
International Law and Human Rights
article

National Implementation of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: In Search of an Appropriate Modality

Abdul Ghafur Hamid
article en

Abstract

The implementation of the Rome Statute in the domestic sphere of each State party is crucial for achieving its ultimate purpose: to end impunity for perpetrators of heinous international crimes. The present paper aims to appraise various modalities for States to implement the Statute. It applies doctrinal legal research by analyzing the relevant provisions of the Rome Statute and evaluating the practice of selected States. The paper finds that the implementation modality primarily depends on whether the State is a monist or a dualist. Even in the same group of States, the details may vary depending on the constitutional law requirements. Several States enact the implementation legislation before adopting the Statute whereas other States do it only after joining the Statute. While many States adopt a single comprehensive legislation incorporating key obligations of the Statute, other States enact multiple legislation to implement the Statute. Yet some States follow the model law approach. After appraising the modalities, the paper concludes with recommendations for further improvement.

Legal SpiritVol. 8(3)
International Islamic University Malaysia (MY)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

National Implementation of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: In Search of an Appropriate Modality — Abdul Ghafur Hamid · Legal Spirit (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS