Efficiencies of and Motivations for Contracting Out in the Public Sector: The Case of Social Services in Spain

ABSTRACT Debates on contracting out to the private sector is primarily focused on the cost efficiency of its provision, drawing on experiences with hard or technical services such as waste and water management. This paper focuses on a growing interest in the role and impact of sourcing decisions in softer or more human‐centered services, such as social services, where sourcing decisions are more complex or multifaceted. Using actual cost data obtained from open access government sources on social services in Spain, the first objective was to compare the cost efficiencies of different sourcing decisions using estimations of Technology Gap Ratios of different municipalities through Order‐M Panel Data. The second objective analyzed motivations for contracting out through a survey of municipal managers in Andalusia using principal components analysis combined with multinominal logit regressions. Our findings suggest that while contracting out to the private sector is, relatively speaking, the most cost efficient, most municipalities have decided to keep service provision in‐house. Decisions to contract out social services are not based only on cost but also incorporate a range of other considerations such as the municipalities' population size, its stakeholder expectations, and other complexities associated with service provision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.13047
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Regulation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficiencies of and Motivations for Contracting Out in the Public Sector: The Case of Social Services in Spain

Danny Chow, Juan Carlos Garrido‐Rodríguez, José Luis Zafra Gómez
3 citations
Public Administration
Regulation and Compliance Studies
1.66
article

Efficiencies of and Motivations for Contracting Out in the Public Sector: The Case of Social Services in Spain

Danny Chow, Juan Carlos Garrido‐Rodríguez, José Luis Zafra Gómez
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Debates on contracting out to the private sector is primarily focused on the cost efficiency of its provision, drawing on experiences with hard or technical services such as waste and water management. This paper focuses on a growing interest in the role and impact of sourcing decisions in softer or more human‐centered services, such as social services, where sourcing decisions are more complex or multifaceted. Using actual cost data obtained from open access government sources on social services in Spain, the first objective was to compare the cost efficiencies of different sourcing decisions using estimations of Technology Gap Ratios of different municipalities through Order‐M Panel Data. The second objective analyzed motivations for contracting out through a survey of municipal managers in Andalusia using principal components analysis combined with multinominal logit regressions. Our findings suggest that while contracting out to the private sector is, relatively speaking, the most cost efficient, most municipalities have decided to keep service provision in‐house. Decisions to contract out social services are not based only on cost but also incorporate a range of other considerations such as the municipalities' population size, its stakeholder expectations, and other complexities associated with service provision.

Public AdministrationVol. 103(3)
National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE), Universidad de Granada (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Universidad de Granada
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Regulation and Compliance Studies
1.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.