Translation of non-technical skills and attitudes to practice after undergraduate interprofessional simulation training

Introduction: We aimed to determine the extent to which non-technical skills and attitudes acquired during undergraduate interprofessional simulation in an Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) course translated into clinical work. Methods: Following ACLS simulation training for final-year nursing and medical students, we conducted a 1-year follow-up survey, when graduates were in clinical practice. We used the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS - higher scores indicate better attitudes to interprofessional practice), and nine contextual questions with prompts for free-form comments. RIPLS scores underwent repeated-measures between-groups (nurses vs doctors) analysis at three timepoints (pre-course, post-course and 1-year). Results: Forty-two surveys (58% response) were received, demonstrating translation of non-technical skills and attitudes to clinical practice, including insights into the skills and roles of others, the importance of communication, and improved perceptions of preparedness for clinical work. However, RIPLS scores for doctors decreased significantly upon beginning clinical work, while scores for nurses continued to increase, demonstrating a significant interaction effect (reduction of 5.7 points to 75.7 versus an increase of 1.3 points to 78.1 respectively – ANOVA, F(2,76)=5.827, p=0.004). Responses to contextual questions suggested that reductions in RIPLS scores for doctors were due to a realisation that dealing with emergency life support was only a small part of their practice. However, the prevailing work cultures of nurses and doctors in the workplace may also play a part. Conclusion: We demonstrated the translation of non-technical skills and attitudes acquired in undergraduate simulation to the clinical workplace. However, results are tempered for junior doctors beginning practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Asia Pacific Scholar
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29060/taps.2025-10-1/sc3349
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translation of non-technical skills and attitudes to practice after undergraduate interprofessional simulation training

Craig S. Webster, Antonia Verstappen, Jennifer Weller, Marcus A. Henning
The Asia Pacific Scholar
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
article

Translation of non-technical skills and attitudes to practice after undergraduate interprofessional simulation training

Craig S. Webster, Antonia Verstappen, Jennifer Weller, Marcus A. Henning
article en

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to determine the extent to which non-technical skills and attitudes acquired during undergraduate interprofessional simulation in an Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) course translated into clinical work. Methods: Following ACLS simulation training for final-year nursing and medical students, we conducted a 1-year follow-up survey, when graduates were in clinical practice. We used the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS - higher scores indicate better attitudes to interprofessional practice), and nine contextual questions with prompts for free-form comments. RIPLS scores underwent repeated-measures between-groups (nurses vs doctors) analysis at three timepoints (pre-course, post-course and 1-year). Results: Forty-two surveys (58% response) were received, demonstrating translation of non-technical skills and attitudes to clinical practice, including insights into the skills and roles of others, the importance of communication, and improved perceptions of preparedness for clinical work. However, RIPLS scores for doctors decreased significantly upon beginning clinical work, while scores for nurses continued to increase, demonstrating a significant interaction effect (reduction of 5.7 points to 75.7 versus an increase of 1.3 points to 78.1 respectively – ANOVA, F(2,76)=5.827, p=0.004). Responses to contextual questions suggested that reductions in RIPLS scores for doctors were due to a realisation that dealing with emergency life support was only a small part of their practice. However, the prevailing work cultures of nurses and doctors in the workplace may also play a part. Conclusion: We demonstrated the translation of non-technical skills and attitudes acquired in undergraduate simulation to the clinical workplace. However, results are tempered for junior doctors beginning practice.

The Asia Pacific ScholarVol. 10(1)
University of Auckland (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.