Promoting medical students’ reflection through feedback interaction: The RAISE model

Introduction: Professional identity formation requires students’ ability to reflect, which can be supported by constructive feedback from teachers. Feedback practice faces many challenges, including those related to sociocultural aspects. Feedback can be optimised by implementing a model suitable to the attributes of students, teachers, and the clinical environment. This study aimed to develop a suitable feedback model and test its effectiveness in promoting reflection. Methods: The model was designed based on the theoretical framework and identified feedback-related attributes in FMUI. Expert reviews and cognitive interviews were conducted before the model was tested. The model’s effectiveness was tested using a quasi-experimental design involving 74 students in the Paediatric Module. Students were asked to reflect on their mini-CEX experience after receiving feedback from teachers, and the depth of reflection was compared between students in the intervention and control group. The depth of reflection was measured using Kember scoring, and bivariate analysis was conducted using SPSS 20.0. Results: The model consists of 5 steps including: Rapport building, Acknowledge students’ strengths, Identify aspect(s) that need improvement, Share teachers’ experiences, and Establish a plan to improve. Deep reflection was more frequently found in the intervention group. Mann-Whitney test showed that the difference between groups was statistically significant (Z=2.964, p=0.003), indicating that reflection in the intervention group was deeper than the control group. Conclusion: The feedback model formulated based on feedback-related attributes in FMUI was named the RAISE model. Upon testing, students receiving the model could reflect more deeply compared to those receiving the standard model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Asia Pacific Scholar
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29060/taps.2025-10-1/oa3247
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Promoting medical students’ reflection through feedback interaction: The RAISE model

Rita Mustika, Lucia R.M. Royanto, Jenny Bashiruddin, Estivana Felaza et al.
The Asia Pacific Scholar
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Promoting medical students’ reflection through feedback interaction: The RAISE model

Rita Mustika, Lucia R.M. Royanto, Jenny Bashiruddin, Estivana Felaza, Joedo Prihartono, Ardi Findyartini, Subha Ramani
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Professional identity formation requires students’ ability to reflect, which can be supported by constructive feedback from teachers. Feedback practice faces many challenges, including those related to sociocultural aspects. Feedback can be optimised by implementing a model suitable to the attributes of students, teachers, and the clinical environment. This study aimed to develop a suitable feedback model and test its effectiveness in promoting reflection. Methods: The model was designed based on the theoretical framework and identified feedback-related attributes in FMUI. Expert reviews and cognitive interviews were conducted before the model was tested. The model’s effectiveness was tested using a quasi-experimental design involving 74 students in the Paediatric Module. Students were asked to reflect on their mini-CEX experience after receiving feedback from teachers, and the depth of reflection was compared between students in the intervention and control group. The depth of reflection was measured using Kember scoring, and bivariate analysis was conducted using SPSS 20.0. Results: The model consists of 5 steps including: Rapport building, Acknowledge students’ strengths, Identify aspect(s) that need improvement, Share teachers’ experiences, and Establish a plan to improve. Deep reflection was more frequently found in the intervention group. Mann-Whitney test showed that the difference between groups was statistically significant (Z=2.964, p=0.003), indicating that reflection in the intervention group was deeper than the control group. Conclusion: The feedback model formulated based on feedback-related attributes in FMUI was named the RAISE model. Upon testing, students receiving the model could reflect more deeply compared to those receiving the standard model.

The Asia Pacific ScholarVol. 10(1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), University of Indonesia (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.