Empirical convergence between Kernberg's model of personality organization and the alternative DSM‐5 model for personality disorders

Both Kernberg's model of personality organization and the alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5th edition provide a multidimensional framework for assessing personality pathology, while having a dual focus on general and specific personality pathology. The present study was the first to investigate the empirical convergence between measures of personality organization and the AMPD (personality functioning and pathological personality traits), considering general and specific personality pathology. A mixed clinical sample completed self-reports for personality organization, personality functioning and pathological personality traits, as well as an interview for personality organization. Two bifactor models with three specific exploratory factors were estimated, comprising a self-report model based on domain scores using exploratory factor analysis (n = 336) and a multi-method model predominantly based on subdomain scores applying exploratory structural equation modelling (n = 277). Both bifactor models yielded strong general factors with high loadings of the personality organization domains identity and primitive defences, as well as the personality functioning domains. The specific factors suggest convergence between other-directed aggression (personality organization), restricted moral functioning (personality organization) and antagonism (pathological personality traits), between diminished reality testing (personality organization) and psychoticism (pathological personality traits) and between maladaptive object relations (personality organization), impaired interpersonal functioning (personality functioning) and detachment (pathological personality traits). It can be concluded that measures of personality organization and the AMPD strongly converge regarding both general and specific personality pathology. Kernberg's model of personality organization may serve as a valuable complement to the AMPD, guiding forthcoming research and the clinical assessment of personality pathology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Mental Health
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1641
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empirical convergence between Kernberg's model of personality organization and the alternative DSM‐5 model for personality disorders

André Kerber, Susanne Hörz‐Sagstetter, Michael Rentrop, Johannes Zimmermann et al.
13 citations
Personality and Mental Health
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
8.31
article

Empirical convergence between Kernberg's model of personality organization and the alternative DSM‐5 model for personality disorders

André Kerber, Susanne Hörz‐Sagstetter, Michael Rentrop, Johannes Zimmermann, Ludwig Ohse, Jil Mohr, Leonie Kampe, O. Busch
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Both Kernberg's model of personality organization and the alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5th edition provide a multidimensional framework for assessing personality pathology, while having a dual focus on general and specific personality pathology. The present study was the first to investigate the empirical convergence between measures of personality organization and the AMPD (personality functioning and pathological personality traits), considering general and specific personality pathology. A mixed clinical sample completed self-reports for personality organization, personality functioning and pathological personality traits, as well as an interview for personality organization. Two bifactor models with three specific exploratory factors were estimated, comprising a self-report model based on domain scores using exploratory factor analysis (n = 336) and a multi-method model predominantly based on subdomain scores applying exploratory structural equation modelling (n = 277). Both bifactor models yielded strong general factors with high loadings of the personality organization domains identity and primitive defences, as well as the personality functioning domains. The specific factors suggest convergence between other-directed aggression (personality organization), restricted moral functioning (personality organization) and antagonism (pathological personality traits), between diminished reality testing (personality organization) and psychoticism (pathological personality traits) and between maladaptive object relations (personality organization), impaired interpersonal functioning (personality functioning) and detachment (pathological personality traits). It can be concluded that measures of personality organization and the AMPD strongly converge regarding both general and specific personality pathology. Kernberg's model of personality organization may serve as a valuable complement to the AMPD, guiding forthcoming research and the clinical assessment of personality pathology.

Personality and Mental HealthVol. 19(1)
University of Kassel (DE), International Psychoanalytic University Berlin (DE), Regionalspital Emmental (CH), Psychologische Hochschule Berlin (DE), Inn-Salzach-Klinikum (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Stifterverband
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
8.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.