Cascading employment as paradigmatic form of precarious work: The case of IT agency workers in the United States

Abstract Cascading employment is an increasingly prevalent yet understudied form of employment arrangement, where an employer places a worker in a client’s workplace through a sequence of labour intermediaries, with no direct contractual relationship between the worker’s employer and the end client. In this article, cascading employment is conceptualised as a distinct and normalised form of precarious work and differs from ‘triangular employment’ in several dimensions. The study reported herein draws on interviews with U.S.-based IT workers and stakeholders engaged in cascading employment. Findings reveal three key dimensions of cascading employment: multilayeredness, hierarchical fissuring, and relationship heterogeneity. These dimensions contribute to the aspects of precariousness of employment, including diluted income, heightened employment uncertainty, reduced worker control over working conditions, and limited legal protections. Moreover, the precariousness of cascading employment stems from the complexity of the employment arrangements, not merely from factors such as contract type, employment status, and industry, which are typical in explaining precariousness. Therefore, ‘complexity of employment arrangements’ should be recognised as a crucial criterion for employment precariousness. ‘Complexity’ can be measured by the number of actors involved, the extent of fissuring in employer costs and responsibilities, and the variety and intensity of inter-actor relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Economic and Labour Relations Review
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/elr.2024.57
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cascading employment as paradigmatic form of precarious work: The case of IT agency workers in the United States

Xiaochen Liang
1 citations
The Economic and Labour Relations Review
Employment and Welfare Studies
0.85
article

Cascading employment as paradigmatic form of precarious work: The case of IT agency workers in the United States

Xiaochen Liang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Cascading employment is an increasingly prevalent yet understudied form of employment arrangement, where an employer places a worker in a client’s workplace through a sequence of labour intermediaries, with no direct contractual relationship between the worker’s employer and the end client. In this article, cascading employment is conceptualised as a distinct and normalised form of precarious work and differs from ‘triangular employment’ in several dimensions. The study reported herein draws on interviews with U.S.-based IT workers and stakeholders engaged in cascading employment. Findings reveal three key dimensions of cascading employment: multilayeredness, hierarchical fissuring, and relationship heterogeneity. These dimensions contribute to the aspects of precariousness of employment, including diluted income, heightened employment uncertainty, reduced worker control over working conditions, and limited legal protections. Moreover, the precariousness of cascading employment stems from the complexity of the employment arrangements, not merely from factors such as contract type, employment status, and industry, which are typical in explaining precariousness. Therefore, ‘complexity of employment arrangements’ should be recognised as a crucial criterion for employment precariousness. ‘Complexity’ can be measured by the number of actors involved, the extent of fissuring in employer costs and responsibilities, and the variety and intensity of inter-actor relationships.

The Economic and Labour Relations ReviewVol. 35(4)
University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Employment and Welfare Studies
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.