Modeling’s Effect of Irregular Building Structure with Vegetated Roof on Seismic Evaluation per ASCE 41-17

This study examines the seismic vulnerability of an irregular educational building with a vegetated roof in Yogyakarta using linear procedures based on ASCE 41-17. Modelling approaches differ Model 1 treats skylights and planter boxes as loads with straight roof slabs, while Models 2 and 3 use shells with sloping roof slabs. Vegetated roofs are featured in Models 1 and 2. The analysis, conducted at seismic hazard levels BSE-1N and BSE-2N using the ETABS program, evaluates structural components and compares Response Spectrum (RS) and Linear Time History (LTH) methods. Results show seismic weight variations of 1.20% to 15.04% between models. Model 1 fails to meet the criteria for modal analysis, while Models 2 and 3 do. The structural performance evaluation based on average demands at BSE-1N and BSE-2N levels varied from Immediate Occupancy to Life Safety performance. The LTH method in all models had higher acceptance ratios than the RS method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Semesta Teknika
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18196/st.v27i2.22775
Primary Topic
Urban and spatial planning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling’s Effect of Irregular Building Structure with Vegetated Roof on Seismic Evaluation per ASCE 41-17

Djoko Sulistyo, Iman Satyarno, Muhammad Puja Fathurrachman
Semesta Teknika
Urban and spatial planning
article

Modeling’s Effect of Irregular Building Structure with Vegetated Roof on Seismic Evaluation per ASCE 41-17

Djoko Sulistyo, Iman Satyarno, Muhammad Puja Fathurrachman
article en

Abstract

This study examines the seismic vulnerability of an irregular educational building with a vegetated roof in Yogyakarta using linear procedures based on ASCE 41-17. Modelling approaches differ Model 1 treats skylights and planter boxes as loads with straight roof slabs, while Models 2 and 3 use shells with sloping roof slabs. Vegetated roofs are featured in Models 1 and 2. The analysis, conducted at seismic hazard levels BSE-1N and BSE-2N using the ETABS program, evaluates structural components and compares Response Spectrum (RS) and Linear Time History (LTH) methods. Results show seismic weight variations of 1.20% to 15.04% between models. Model 1 fails to meet the criteria for modal analysis, while Models 2 and 3 do. The structural performance evaluation based on average demands at BSE-1N and BSE-2N levels varied from Immediate Occupancy to Life Safety performance. The LTH method in all models had higher acceptance ratios than the RS method.

Semesta TeknikaVol. 27(2)
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Urban and spatial planning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.