On shrinkage covariance estimators: how inefficient is 1/N strategy of covariance estimation for portfolio selection in foreign exchange market?

We investigate portfolio selection performance as in Markowitz by evaluating variance matrix estimation criteria in the currency market. This study challenges theoretically rigorous shrinkage covariance estimators using multiple evaluation metrics: systematic loss function, risk profile of minimum variance portfolios, Herfindahl index, financial efficiency, and concentration level. We assess out-of-sample performance across conventional models, factor models, linear shrinkage estimators, and equally weighted portfolios by applying mean-variance criteria and minimum variance framework to the 10 most traded currencies. Our findings reveal that mean-variance optimal portfolios are concentrated, counterintuitive, and highly sensitive to optimizer input choices in currency markets. We discovered that shrinkage estimators do not provide additional benefits to investors and fund managers regarding systematic loss function and minimum variance portfolio risk profiles. The research highlights critical limitations in traditional portfolio construction approaches, demonstrating that portfolios built using mean-variance criteria are prone to significant input data sensitivity and tend to create overly concentrated investments. Consequently, the study suggests that investors and fund managers should exercise caution when selecting covariance estimators and consider exploring more diversified strategies to optimize portfolio performance in foreign exchange markets.This study critically evaluates the efficacy of covariance estimators in optimizing portfolios within the foreign exchange market, highlighting limitations of traditional and sophisticated shrinkage methods. Through comprehensive analysis, it demonstrates that mean-variance optimal portfolios are prone to input sensitivity and concentration, offering little advantage to fund managers over simpler 1/N diversification strategies. With a comprehensive dataset spanning decades, the research provides actionable insights into minimizing estimation errors and improving portfolio stability. The findings challenge prevailing methodologies, emphasizing simplicity and diversification to enhance decision-making for investors, fund managers, and policymakers navigating the complexities of currency markets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Economics & Finance
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2024.2431542
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On shrinkage covariance estimators: how inefficient is 1/N strategy of covariance estimation for portfolio selection in foreign exchange market?

Shamrez Ali, Ammar Jreisat, Qaiser Munir, Muhammad Iftikhar ul Husnain
1 citations
Cogent Economics & Finance
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
0.54
article

On shrinkage covariance estimators: how inefficient is 1/N strategy of covariance estimation for portfolio selection in foreign exchange market?

Shamrez Ali, Ammar Jreisat, Qaiser Munir, Muhammad Iftikhar ul Husnain
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We investigate portfolio selection performance as in Markowitz by evaluating variance matrix estimation criteria in the currency market. This study challenges theoretically rigorous shrinkage covariance estimators using multiple evaluation metrics: systematic loss function, risk profile of minimum variance portfolios, Herfindahl index, financial efficiency, and concentration level. We assess out-of-sample performance across conventional models, factor models, linear shrinkage estimators, and equally weighted portfolios by applying mean-variance criteria and minimum variance framework to the 10 most traded currencies. Our findings reveal that mean-variance optimal portfolios are concentrated, counterintuitive, and highly sensitive to optimizer input choices in currency markets. We discovered that shrinkage estimators do not provide additional benefits to investors and fund managers regarding systematic loss function and minimum variance portfolio risk profiles. The research highlights critical limitations in traditional portfolio construction approaches, demonstrating that portfolios built using mean-variance criteria are prone to significant input data sensitivity and tend to create overly concentrated investments. Consequently, the study suggests that investors and fund managers should exercise caution when selecting covariance estimators and consider exploring more diversified strategies to optimize portfolio performance in foreign exchange markets.This study critically evaluates the efficacy of covariance estimators in optimizing portfolios within the foreign exchange market, highlighting limitations of traditional and sophisticated shrinkage methods. Through comprehensive analysis, it demonstrates that mean-variance optimal portfolios are prone to input sensitivity and concentration, offering little advantage to fund managers over simpler 1/N diversification strategies. With a comprehensive dataset spanning decades, the research provides actionable insights into minimizing estimation errors and improving portfolio stability. The findings challenge prevailing methodologies, emphasizing simplicity and diversification to enhance decision-making for investors, fund managers, and policymakers navigating the complexities of currency markets.

Cogent Economics & FinanceVol. 12(1)
University of Bahrain (BH), University of Sargodha (PK), University of Sahiwal
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.