3D-Printed Poly(ester urethane)/Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/Bioglass Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications

Biodegradable polymers and bioceramics give rise to composite structures that serve as scaffolds to promote tissue regeneration. The current research explores the preparation of biodegradable filaments for additive manufacturing. Bioresorbable segmented poly(ester urethanes) (SPEUs) are easily printable elastomers but lack bioactivity and present low elastic modulus, making them unsuitable for applications such as bone tissue engineering. Strategies such as blending and composite filament production still constitute an important challenge in addressing SPEU limitations. In this work, SPEU-poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) blends and SPEU-PHBV-Bioglass 45S5<sup>®</sup> (BG) composite materials were processed into filaments and 3D structures. A comprehensive characterization of their morphology and thermal and mechanical properties is presented. The production of 3D structures based on SPEU-PHBV with excellent dimensional precision was achieved. Although SPEU-PHBV-BG printed structures showed some defects associated with the printing process, the physicochemical, thermal, and mechanical properties of these materials hold promise. The blend composition, BG content and particle size, processing parameters, and blending techniques were carefully managed to ensure that the mechanical behavior of the material remained under control. The incorporation of PHBV in SPEU-PHBV at 70:30 <i>w</i>/<i>w</i> and BG (5 wt%) acted as reinforcement, enhancing both the elastic modulus of the filaments and the compressive mechanical behavior of the 3D matrices. The compressive stress of the printed scaffold was found to be 1.48 ± 0.13 MPa, which is optimal for tissues such as human proximal tibial trabecular bone. Therefore, these materials show potential for use in the design and manufacture of customized structures for bone tissue engineering.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymers
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16233355
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3D-Printed Poly(ester urethane)/Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/Bioglass Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications

Gustavo A. Abraham, Beatriz Aráoz, Pablo C. Caracciolo, Mariano H. Talou et al.
2 citations
Polymers
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
0.37
article

3D-Printed Poly(ester urethane)/Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/Bioglass Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications

Gustavo A. Abraham, Beatriz Aráoz, Pablo C. Caracciolo, Mariano H. Talou, Élida B. Hermida, Aldo Roberto Boccaccini, Xavier Hung, Nayla J. Lores
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Biodegradable polymers and bioceramics give rise to composite structures that serve as scaffolds to promote tissue regeneration. The current research explores the preparation of biodegradable filaments for additive manufacturing. Bioresorbable segmented poly(ester urethanes) (SPEUs) are easily printable elastomers but lack bioactivity and present low elastic modulus, making them unsuitable for applications such as bone tissue engineering. Strategies such as blending and composite filament production still constitute an important challenge in addressing SPEU limitations. In this work, SPEU-poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) blends and SPEU-PHBV-Bioglass 45S5<sup>®</sup> (BG) composite materials were processed into filaments and 3D structures. A comprehensive characterization of their morphology and thermal and mechanical properties is presented. The production of 3D structures based on SPEU-PHBV with excellent dimensional precision was achieved. Although SPEU-PHBV-BG printed structures showed some defects associated with the printing process, the physicochemical, thermal, and mechanical properties of these materials hold promise. The blend composition, BG content and particle size, processing parameters, and blending techniques were carefully managed to ensure that the mechanical behavior of the material remained under control. The incorporation of PHBV in SPEU-PHBV at 70:30 <i>w</i>/<i>w</i> and BG (5 wt%) acted as reinforcement, enhancing both the elastic modulus of the filaments and the compressive mechanical behavior of the 3D matrices. The compressive stress of the printed scaffold was found to be 1.48 ± 0.13 MPa, which is optimal for tissues such as human proximal tibial trabecular bone. Therefore, these materials show potential for use in the design and manufacture of customized structures for bone tissue engineering.

PolymersVol. 16(23)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), National University of Mar del Plata (AR), National University of General San Martín (AR), Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales (AR)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Agencia Nacional de Promoción de la Investigación, el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación, Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.