Disruptions in Lung Cancer Detection During COVID-19

<b>Objective:</b> To quantify the extent of the disruption and recovery of lung cancer detection during the first two years of the pandemic, focusing on disparities across demographic and community factors. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective cohort study used the SEER database to identify lung cancer cases from 2001 to 2021. Expected incidence rates for 2020 and 2021 were projected based on pre-pandemic trends (2000-2019) using the NCI's Joinpoint Regression program. Percent differences between expected and observed incidence rates were calculated. Multivariate and propensity score analyses were conducted to quantify changes in the odds of being diagnosed with metastatic disease during the pandemic. <b>Results:</b> Lung cancer incidence fell by 10% in 2020 compared to pre-pandemic projections, with rural populations, non-Hispanic Black and Asian patients, and females disproportionately affected. By 2021, detection rates partially recovered but remained 5% below expected levels. Localized disease detection improved significantly, while rural communities not adjacent to metropolitan areas faced further declines. Adjusted analyses showed that patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and those of Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, or Asian/Pacific Islander ethnicity had persistently higher rates of distant disease presentation through 2021. <b>Conclusions:</b> The pandemic significantly reduced lung cancer detection, with only partial recovery by 2021. Persistent gaps, particularly in rural and minoritized populations, highlight the need for targeted interventions to reengage these communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16234001
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disruptions in Lung Cancer Detection During COVID-19

Uriel Kim, Christina S. Boutros, Richard S. Hoehn, Trisha Lal et al.
5 citations
Cancers
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
2.09
article

Disruptions in Lung Cancer Detection During COVID-19

Uriel Kim, Christina S. Boutros, Richard S. Hoehn, Trisha Lal, Natalie Chakraborty, Susan Doh, Christopher W. Towe
article en
5 citations

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> To quantify the extent of the disruption and recovery of lung cancer detection during the first two years of the pandemic, focusing on disparities across demographic and community factors. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective cohort study used the SEER database to identify lung cancer cases from 2001 to 2021. Expected incidence rates for 2020 and 2021 were projected based on pre-pandemic trends (2000-2019) using the NCI's Joinpoint Regression program. Percent differences between expected and observed incidence rates were calculated. Multivariate and propensity score analyses were conducted to quantify changes in the odds of being diagnosed with metastatic disease during the pandemic. <b>Results:</b> Lung cancer incidence fell by 10% in 2020 compared to pre-pandemic projections, with rural populations, non-Hispanic Black and Asian patients, and females disproportionately affected. By 2021, detection rates partially recovered but remained 5% below expected levels. Localized disease detection improved significantly, while rural communities not adjacent to metropolitan areas faced further declines. Adjusted analyses showed that patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and those of Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, or Asian/Pacific Islander ethnicity had persistently higher rates of distant disease presentation through 2021. <b>Conclusions:</b> The pandemic significantly reduced lung cancer detection, with only partial recovery by 2021. Persistent gaps, particularly in rural and minoritized populations, highlight the need for targeted interventions to reengage these communities.

CancersVol. 16(23)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), University Hospitals of Cleveland (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
2.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.