A critical analysis of different forms of employee ownership

From the 1970’s, there has been almost a half-century of development of employee-owned firms. There has been a wide variety of legal/capital structures that have been tried but too little analysis of which legal forms work or don’t work over the longer term, e.g. the transition from one generation of employee-owners to the next generation of employee owners. This paper provides a critical analysis of the major forms. These include the forms based on common ownership (Yugoslav self-managed firms and the UK EOTs), the older plywood cooperatives in the US Northwest along with the Spanish Sociedades Laborales, and the American Employee Stock Ownership Plans (US ESOPs). Finally, we advocate a variation on the US ESOP model, called the ‘European ESOP’, that seems to avoid some pitfalls and combines the best aspects of the past forms of employee ownership.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Applied Economics
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2024.2435408
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A critical analysis of different forms of employee ownership

Tej Gonza, David Ellerman
7 citations
International Review of Applied Economics
Labor Movements and Unions
5.99
article

A critical analysis of different forms of employee ownership

Tej Gonza, David Ellerman
article en
7 citations

Abstract

From the 1970’s, there has been almost a half-century of development of employee-owned firms. There has been a wide variety of legal/capital structures that have been tried but too little analysis of which legal forms work or don’t work over the longer term, e.g. the transition from one generation of employee-owners to the next generation of employee owners. This paper provides a critical analysis of the major forms. These include the forms based on common ownership (Yugoslav self-managed firms and the UK EOTs), the older plywood cooperatives in the US Northwest along with the Spanish Sociedades Laborales, and the American Employee Stock Ownership Plans (US ESOPs). Finally, we advocate a variation on the US ESOP model, called the ‘European ESOP’, that seems to avoid some pitfalls and combines the best aspects of the past forms of employee ownership.

International Review of Applied EconomicsVol. 39(2-3)
University of Ljubljana (SI), Institute for Economic Research (SI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Labor Movements and Unions
5.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A critical analysis of different forms of employee ownership — Tej Gonza, David Ellerman · International Review of Applied Economics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS