The Genetic Edge: Revolutionizing Multi-Constraint Fractional Knapsack Solutions

Under linear constraints, a greedy algorithm effectively solves the fractional knapsack problem. However, when additional constraints, such as weight and risk, are added, the complexity of the approach rises. Previous studies have shown that the greedy strategy is optimal under single linear constraints and have provided comprehensive documentation of its efficacy in solving the fractional knapsack problem in straightforward, unconstrained circumstances. Nevertheless, there hasn't been much research done on using greedy algorithms to solve issues with many constraints. This study examines how well genetic algorithms (GAs) perform in comparison to the greedy technique for solving the fractional knapsack problem under conditions with various restrictions. Our results show that, although the greedy method is still efficient in linear or unconstrained circumstances, GAs perform better when dealing with various constraints and provide better solutions in spite of their increased complexity of calculation. This study demonstrates the benefits of using evolutionary algorithms to solve difficult restricted optimization issues when more conventional approaches fall short.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SPAST Reports.
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69848/sreports.v1i8.5111
Primary Topic
Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Genetic Edge: Revolutionizing Multi-Constraint Fractional Knapsack Solutions

Apurva Tiwari, M. K. Tiwari
SPAST Reports.
Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
article

The Genetic Edge: Revolutionizing Multi-Constraint Fractional Knapsack Solutions

Apurva Tiwari, M. K. Tiwari
article en

Abstract

Under linear constraints, a greedy algorithm effectively solves the fractional knapsack problem. However, when additional constraints, such as weight and risk, are added, the complexity of the approach rises. Previous studies have shown that the greedy strategy is optimal under single linear constraints and have provided comprehensive documentation of its efficacy in solving the fractional knapsack problem in straightforward, unconstrained circumstances. Nevertheless, there hasn't been much research done on using greedy algorithms to solve issues with many constraints. This study examines how well genetic algorithms (GAs) perform in comparison to the greedy technique for solving the fractional knapsack problem under conditions with various restrictions. Our results show that, although the greedy method is still efficient in linear or unconstrained circumstances, GAs perform better when dealing with various constraints and provide better solutions in spite of their increased complexity of calculation. This study demonstrates the benefits of using evolutionary algorithms to solve difficult restricted optimization issues when more conventional approaches fall short.

SPAST Reports.Vol. 1(8)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Genetic Edge: Revolutionizing Multi-Constraint Fractional Knapsack Solutions — Apurva Tiwari, M. K. Tiwari · SPAST Reports. (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS