Blast Testing of a Cold-Formed Steel-Framed Building with a Roof Truss System: II. Component-Level Response

This paper presents the measured responses of components—blast wall, shear walls, deep beam and bottom chord bracing, and a roof truss—of an instrumented full-scale cold-formed steel (CFS)-framed building subjected to open-arena blast testing. The objective of this test program is to provide a rich data set to inform future research, analysis, and design of these building components for structures that may be subjected to blast loads. A companion paper presents the blast loading, system-level responses, and observed damage, while this paper focuses on component-level responses. The behavior of the blast wall was examined through instrumentation of the central stud with linear variable differential transformers (LVDTs), shock accelerometers, and strain gauges. Additionally, load cells installed at several anchors connecting the bottom track of the blast wall to the foundation recorded hold-down forces along the wall developed during the test. In-plane displacement vectors and time histories for points on one of the shear walls were obtained from high-speed video, while a load cell positioned at an anchor at the bottom track of the shear wall was used to investigate hold-down forces at the shear wall. Forces in the bottom chord bracing of the roof diaphragm were studied through strain measurements. Lastly, the behavior of the roof truss was studied using measurements obtained from an array of LVDTs, shock accelerometers, and strain gauges mounted on the central truss. The results and single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) analyses serve to provide greater insight into component-level responses, interactions between building components and subcomponents, and evidence of component and connection behaviors that have not been previously documented in the published literature for CFS-framed buildings subjected to blast loads. The performance of the building components and supporting SDOF analyses demonstrate significant energy absorbing capacity of conventionally constructed CFS stud walls that exceed established performance criteria in current design standards and offer experimental observations to support future development of performance criteria for CFS shear walls and roof trusses, which currently do not exist.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Structural Engineering
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jsendh.steng-13520
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blast Testing of a Cold-Formed Steel-Framed Building with a Roof Truss System: II. Component-Level Response

David C. Weggel, Matthew J. Whelan, Ahmed Khalil, J.P. Moss et al.
2 citations
Journal of Structural Engineering
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
0.52
article

Blast Testing of a Cold-Formed Steel-Framed Building with a Roof Truss System: II. Component-Level Response

David C. Weggel, Matthew J. Whelan, Ahmed Khalil, J.P. Moss, Nabil A. Rahman
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper presents the measured responses of components—blast wall, shear walls, deep beam and bottom chord bracing, and a roof truss—of an instrumented full-scale cold-formed steel (CFS)-framed building subjected to open-arena blast testing. The objective of this test program is to provide a rich data set to inform future research, analysis, and design of these building components for structures that may be subjected to blast loads. A companion paper presents the blast loading, system-level responses, and observed damage, while this paper focuses on component-level responses. The behavior of the blast wall was examined through instrumentation of the central stud with linear variable differential transformers (LVDTs), shock accelerometers, and strain gauges. Additionally, load cells installed at several anchors connecting the bottom track of the blast wall to the foundation recorded hold-down forces along the wall developed during the test. In-plane displacement vectors and time histories for points on one of the shear walls were obtained from high-speed video, while a load cell positioned at an anchor at the bottom track of the shear wall was used to investigate hold-down forces at the shear wall. Forces in the bottom chord bracing of the roof diaphragm were studied through strain measurements. Lastly, the behavior of the roof truss was studied using measurements obtained from an array of LVDTs, shock accelerometers, and strain gauges mounted on the central truss. The results and single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) analyses serve to provide greater insight into component-level responses, interactions between building components and subcomponents, and evidence of component and connection behaviors that have not been previously documented in the published literature for CFS-framed buildings subjected to blast loads. The performance of the building components and supporting SDOF analyses demonstrate significant energy absorbing capacity of conventionally constructed CFS stud walls that exceed established performance criteria in current design standards and offer experimental observations to support future development of performance criteria for CFS shear walls and roof trusses, which currently do not exist.

Journal of Structural EngineeringVol. 151(2)
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US), Family Health International 360 (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
0.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.