ENHANCING PRENATAL DIAGNOSTIC YIELD OF CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITIES BY COMBINED IMPLEMENTATION OF ARRAY-CGH AND TRADITIONAL KARYOTYPING AT HANOI OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY HOSPITAL

Background: While karyotyping remains the gold standard for prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities, it is limited to detecting alterations larger than 5 Mb (over 5 million base pairs). In contrast, array CGH (Microarray-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization) provides a comprehensive analysis of all 24 chromosomes, enabling the detection of chromosomal imbalances, including aneuploidy, losses, and duplications. Additionally, array CGH can identify chromosomal abnormalities even in the absence of specific diagnostic indications. Aim: This study aims to assess the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities using the array CGH technique in comparison with karyotyping at Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital. Methods: A total of 399 pregnant women with a gestational age of 17 to 28 weeks underwent amniocentesis at Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital 2020 and 2022. Amniotic fluid samples were simultaneously analyzed using both array CGH and karyotyping techniques. Results: The karyotyping method identified chromosomal abnormalities in 63 out of 399 cases (15.79%), while array CGH detected abnormalities in 98 out of 399 cases (24.56%). Both techniques identified 49 cases of aneuploidy. For larger deletions and duplications, array CGH detected 14 cases compared to 8 identified by karyotyping. In contrast, array CGH identified 16 cases of small deletions and duplications, whereas karyotyping identified only 1 case. Conclusion: Array CGH is a highly accurate diagnostic tool that effectively detects structural chromosomal abnormalities, particularly small deletions and duplications, which may be missed by karyotyping techniques. This underscores the importance of integrating array CGH into prenatal diagnostic protocols for enhanced detection of chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v544i2.11949
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ENHANCING PRENATAL DIAGNOSTIC YIELD OF CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITIES BY COMBINED IMPLEMENTATION OF ARRAY-CGH AND TRADITIONAL KARYOTYPING AT HANOI OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY HOSPITAL

Thang Toan Vuong, Anh Duy Nguyen, Linh Thuy Dinh
Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

ENHANCING PRENATAL DIAGNOSTIC YIELD OF CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITIES BY COMBINED IMPLEMENTATION OF ARRAY-CGH AND TRADITIONAL KARYOTYPING AT HANOI OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY HOSPITAL

Thang Toan Vuong, Anh Duy Nguyen, Linh Thuy Dinh
article en

Abstract

Background: While karyotyping remains the gold standard for prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities, it is limited to detecting alterations larger than 5 Mb (over 5 million base pairs). In contrast, array CGH (Microarray-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization) provides a comprehensive analysis of all 24 chromosomes, enabling the detection of chromosomal imbalances, including aneuploidy, losses, and duplications. Additionally, array CGH can identify chromosomal abnormalities even in the absence of specific diagnostic indications. Aim: This study aims to assess the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities using the array CGH technique in comparison with karyotyping at Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital. Methods: A total of 399 pregnant women with a gestational age of 17 to 28 weeks underwent amniocentesis at Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital 2020 and 2022. Amniotic fluid samples were simultaneously analyzed using both array CGH and karyotyping techniques. Results: The karyotyping method identified chromosomal abnormalities in 63 out of 399 cases (15.79%), while array CGH detected abnormalities in 98 out of 399 cases (24.56%). Both techniques identified 49 cases of aneuploidy. For larger deletions and duplications, array CGH detected 14 cases compared to 8 identified by karyotyping. In contrast, array CGH identified 16 cases of small deletions and duplications, whereas karyotyping identified only 1 case. Conclusion: Array CGH is a highly accurate diagnostic tool that effectively detects structural chromosomal abnormalities, particularly small deletions and duplications, which may be missed by karyotyping techniques. This underscores the importance of integrating array CGH into prenatal diagnostic protocols for enhanced detection of chromosomal abnormalities.

Tạp chí Y học Việt NamVol. 544(2)
National Hospital (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ENHANCING PRENATAL DIAGNOSTIC YIELD OF CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITIES BY COMBINED IMPLEMENTATION OF ARRAY-CGH AND TRADITIONAL KARYOTYPING AT HANOI OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY HOSPITAL — Thang Toan Vuong, Anh Duy Nguyen, et al. · Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS