Detailed analysis of the histology-specific impact of ascites volume on the outcome of epithelial ovarian cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study

The accumulation of even a low to intermediate volume of ascites (≥ 100 mL) was confirmed to be an independent poor prognostic factor in epithelial ovarian cancer. Furthermore, its prognostic impact differed among histotypes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13218-1
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detailed analysis of the histology-specific impact of ascites volume on the outcome of epithelial ovarian cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study

Mariko Kimura, Shohei Iyoshi, Sho Tano, Ryo Emoto et al.
3 citations
BMC Cancer
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
1.61
article

Detailed analysis of the histology-specific impact of ascites volume on the outcome of epithelial ovarian cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study

Mariko Kimura, Shohei Iyoshi, Sho Tano, Ryo Emoto, Kaname Uno, Kazuhisa Kitami, Shigeyuki Matsui, Hiroki Fujimoto, Nobuhisa Yoshikawa, Masato Yoshihara, Kazumasa Mogi, Atsushi Kunishima, Emiri Miyamoto, Hiroaki Kajiyama
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The accumulation of even a low to intermediate volume of ascites (≥ 100 mL) was confirmed to be an independent poor prognostic factor in epithelial ovarian cancer. Furthermore, its prognostic impact differed among histotypes.

BMC CancerVol. 24(1)
Okazaki City Hospital (JP), Aichi Cancer Center (JP), The University of Adelaide (AU), Nagoya University (JP)
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
1.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.