10002- MPC-1 HISTOLOGICAL GRADE AND TP53 MUTATIONS STRATIFY PROGNOSIS IN MOLECULAR GLIOBLASTOMA

Abstract BACKGROUND In the 2021 WHO Central Nervous System tumor classification, the Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype diagnosis has changed markedly. We compared the clinical backgrounds and prognoses of molecular glioblastoma (mGBM) and conventional glioblastoma (histological glioblastoma, hGBM) in a Japanese cohort. METHODS We included 274 patients with glioblastoma who were treated at five institutions from 2011 to 2023. Driver gene analysis was performed using a brain tumor-specific custom gene panel to verify the association between molecular and clinical information. RESULTS Patients with mGBM had a better preoperative KPS, lower Ki-67, and lower removal rates than did those who had hGBM. Overall survival was longer in patients with mGBM than in those with hGBM (1207 vs 598 days, p = 0.032). TP53 mutation (hazard ratio: 5.33, 95% confidence interval: 0.26 - 108.7, p = 0.012) and histological grade 3 (p = 0.045) were significant poor prognostic factors in mGBM. CONCLUSION Patients with mGBM had better preoperative KPS, worse removal rates, lower Ki-67 labeling index, and better overall survival than did those with hGBM. Additionally, histological grade of mGBM is potentially useful for estimating prognosis. Glioblastoma in the WHO CNS5 2021 remains a heterogeneous population, and prognostic stratification based on the patient’s clinical background and molecular information is desirable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology Advances
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae173.049
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

10002- MPC-1 HISTOLOGICAL GRADE AND TP53 MUTATIONS STRATIFY PROGNOSIS IN MOLECULAR GLIOBLASTOMA

Junkoh Yamamoto, Nayuta Higa, Toshiaki Akahane, Daisuke Kuga et al.
Neuro-Oncology Advances
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

10002- MPC-1 HISTOLOGICAL GRADE AND TP53 MUTATIONS STRATIFY PROGNOSIS IN MOLECULAR GLIOBLASTOMA

Junkoh Yamamoto, Nayuta Higa, Toshiaki Akahane, Daisuke Kuga, Ryosuke Otsuji, Ryutaro Makino, Akihide Tanimoto, Hiroyuki Uchida, Seiya Yokoyama, Koji Yoshimoto, Yutaka Fujioka, Masamichi Kurosaki, Nobutaka Horie, Mari Kirishima, Ryosuke Hanaya, Hitoshi Yamahata, Hajime Yonezawa, Tomoko Takajo
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND In the 2021 WHO Central Nervous System tumor classification, the Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype diagnosis has changed markedly. We compared the clinical backgrounds and prognoses of molecular glioblastoma (mGBM) and conventional glioblastoma (histological glioblastoma, hGBM) in a Japanese cohort. METHODS We included 274 patients with glioblastoma who were treated at five institutions from 2011 to 2023. Driver gene analysis was performed using a brain tumor-specific custom gene panel to verify the association between molecular and clinical information. RESULTS Patients with mGBM had a better preoperative KPS, lower Ki-67, and lower removal rates than did those who had hGBM. Overall survival was longer in patients with mGBM than in those with hGBM (1207 vs 598 days, p = 0.032). TP53 mutation (hazard ratio: 5.33, 95% confidence interval: 0.26 - 108.7, p = 0.012) and histological grade 3 (p = 0.045) were significant poor prognostic factors in mGBM. CONCLUSION Patients with mGBM had better preoperative KPS, worse removal rates, lower Ki-67 labeling index, and better overall survival than did those with hGBM. Additionally, histological grade of mGBM is potentially useful for estimating prognosis. Glioblastoma in the WHO CNS5 2021 remains a heterogeneous population, and prognostic stratification based on the patient’s clinical background and molecular information is desirable.

Neuro-Oncology AdvancesVol. 6(Supplement_4)
Kagoshima University (JP), Hiroshima University (JP), Kyushu University (JP), University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan (JP), Tottori University (JP)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.