Can American pressure change China?

Abstract This essay explores the ongoing strategic debate in the U.S. regarding whether to increase pressure on China to change its behavior or governance. It critiques the “maximum pressure” strategy advocated by some analysts and former officials, which draws inspiration from the Cold War tactics used against the Soviet Union. The essay argues that such a strategy is unlikely to succeed and could lead to unintended consequences, including war. It highlights the historical inaccuracies in comparing the current U.S.-China rivalry to the Cold War, noting that the Soviet Union's collapse was not solely due to U.S. pressure but also internal systemic failures. The article concludes that a strategy focused on coercive pressure may trigger a dangerous backlash from China. It stresses the importance of managing the rivalry in a way that acknowledges the limits of American influence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
China International Strategy Review
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-024-00175-4
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can American pressure change China?

Michael J. Mazarr
China International Strategy Review
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

Can American pressure change China?

Michael J. Mazarr
article en

Abstract

Abstract This essay explores the ongoing strategic debate in the U.S. regarding whether to increase pressure on China to change its behavior or governance. It critiques the “maximum pressure” strategy advocated by some analysts and former officials, which draws inspiration from the Cold War tactics used against the Soviet Union. The essay argues that such a strategy is unlikely to succeed and could lead to unintended consequences, including war. It highlights the historical inaccuracies in comparing the current U.S.-China rivalry to the Cold War, noting that the Soviet Union's collapse was not solely due to U.S. pressure but also internal systemic failures. The article concludes that a strategy focused on coercive pressure may trigger a dangerous backlash from China. It stresses the importance of managing the rivalry in a way that acknowledges the limits of American influence.

China International Strategy ReviewVol. 6(2)
RAND Corporation (US)
RAND Corporation
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.