10309- ACT-18 A PHASE 1, RANDOMIZED, PERIOPERATIVE TRIAL OF VORASIDENIB AND IVOSIDENIB IN DIFFUSE GLIOMA WITH AN IDH1 MUTATION: UPDATED RESULTS

Abstract INTRODUCTION Vorasidenib (VOR) and ivosidenib (IVO) showed clinical activity in patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant (mIDH) gliomas. We evaluated both agents in a Phase 1, randomized, open-label perioperative trial (NCT03343197). Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and preliminary objective response rate (ORR) data as of April-29, 2020 were previously reported (Mellinghoff et al. Nat Med 2023). Progression-free survival (PFS) data were not mature at publication time. Herein, we report longer-term follow-up results, including mature PFS. METHODS Patients with grade 2/3 non-enhancing mIDH1 R132H mutant gliomas were randomized to VOR (50 or 10 mg QD), IVO (500 or 250 mg BID), or no treatment (control) for 4 weeks prior to planned surgery, with the option to continue treatment with VOR or IVO postsurgery. Secondary objectives included PFS, ORR assessed by investigator in the postsurgery period, and safety profile of VOR and IVO. RESULTS Enrollment completed in April-2019. Of the 49 patients randomized, 46 (24 oligodendroglioma, 20 astrocytoma, one anaplastic oligodendroglioma, one anaplastic oligoastrocytoma) received treatment with either VOR (n=24) or IVO (n=22) after surgery. As of data cutoff (September-23, 2023), 11 (46%) and five (20%) patients remained on treatment for VOR and IVO, respectively. Median (range) post-operative treatment duration was 44.7 months (0.9–62.7) for VOR, 23.9 months (0–62.7) for IVO. Median (95% CI) PFS was 41.4 months (9.3–NE) for VOR, 38.6 months (18.3–NE) for IVO. ORR per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology in low-grade gliomas was 46% for VOR and 27% for IVO. Longer safety follow-up will also be presented. CONCLUSIONS These results provide further evidence of prolonged response using IVO and VOR immediately following surgery in predominantly non-enhancing gliomas. This longer-term follow-up is consistent with Phase 3 INDIGO study results in which VOR demonstrated PFS benefit with manageable safety, compared with placebo, in patients with non-enhancing mIDH gliomas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology Advances
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae173.034
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

10309- ACT-18 A PHASE 1, RANDOMIZED, PERIOPERATIVE TRIAL OF VORASIDENIB AND IVOSIDENIB IN DIFFUSE GLIOMA WITH AN IDH1 MUTATION: UPDATED RESULTS

Lori Steelman, Islam Hassan, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Patrick Yung Wen et al.
Neuro-Oncology Advances
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

10309- ACT-18 A PHASE 1, RANDOMIZED, PERIOPERATIVE TRIAL OF VORASIDENIB AND IVOSIDENIB IN DIFFUSE GLIOMA WITH AN IDH1 MUTATION: UPDATED RESULTS

Lori Steelman, Islam Hassan, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Patrick Yung Wen, Isabel Arrillaga‐Romany, Benjamin M. Ellingson, Jennifer Clarke, Elizabeth A. Maher, Timothy F. Cloughesy, Jennie Taylor, Estelle Baron, Paria Mahboub-Johnson
article en

Abstract

Abstract INTRODUCTION Vorasidenib (VOR) and ivosidenib (IVO) showed clinical activity in patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant (mIDH) gliomas. We evaluated both agents in a Phase 1, randomized, open-label perioperative trial (NCT03343197). Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and preliminary objective response rate (ORR) data as of April-29, 2020 were previously reported (Mellinghoff et al. Nat Med 2023). Progression-free survival (PFS) data were not mature at publication time. Herein, we report longer-term follow-up results, including mature PFS. METHODS Patients with grade 2/3 non-enhancing mIDH1 R132H mutant gliomas were randomized to VOR (50 or 10 mg QD), IVO (500 or 250 mg BID), or no treatment (control) for 4 weeks prior to planned surgery, with the option to continue treatment with VOR or IVO postsurgery. Secondary objectives included PFS, ORR assessed by investigator in the postsurgery period, and safety profile of VOR and IVO. RESULTS Enrollment completed in April-2019. Of the 49 patients randomized, 46 (24 oligodendroglioma, 20 astrocytoma, one anaplastic oligodendroglioma, one anaplastic oligoastrocytoma) received treatment with either VOR (n=24) or IVO (n=22) after surgery. As of data cutoff (September-23, 2023), 11 (46%) and five (20%) patients remained on treatment for VOR and IVO, respectively. Median (range) post-operative treatment duration was 44.7 months (0.9–62.7) for VOR, 23.9 months (0–62.7) for IVO. Median (95% CI) PFS was 41.4 months (9.3–NE) for VOR, 38.6 months (18.3–NE) for IVO. ORR per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology in low-grade gliomas was 46% for VOR and 27% for IVO. Longer safety follow-up will also be presented. CONCLUSIONS These results provide further evidence of prolonged response using IVO and VOR immediately following surgery in predominantly non-enhancing gliomas. This longer-term follow-up is consistent with Phase 3 INDIGO study results in which VOR demonstrated PFS benefit with manageable safety, compared with placebo, in patients with non-enhancing mIDH gliomas.

Neuro-Oncology AdvancesVol. 6(Supplement_4)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Harvard University (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, University of Utah, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Tel Aviv University, Servier, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Sorbonne Université, University of California, Los Angeles
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.