Determinants of Poverty among Farming Household in South-East Nigeria

The study specifically profiled the socioeconomic characteristics, determined the level of poverty among farming households, and identified the determinant of poverty among farming households with descriptive statistics and a logistics regression model. General household survey secondary data was used. The data obtained was analyzed with descriptive statistics, such as mean, which was used to describe socio-economic characteristics of farming households, and the dimension of poverty among the farmers of 5 states was related by classifying the respondents into poor, moderately poor, and non-poor using the poverty line, and a logit model was used to examine the determinant of poverty among farming households in the southeast of Nigeria. Findings from the study revealed the average age of the respondent to be approximately 48 years. The mean household size is about 2, and the average income earned is about N24125. Age is negative and significantly influences household poverty status. Household size was found to be positive, and it significantly affected the poverty status of the farming household by 1%. Income from non-farm activities is positive, and it’s significant at 1%. Access to extension is positive and significant at 5%. Also, the source of electricity is positive, and it’s significant at 5%. Finally, the water source is positive, and it’s significant at 10%. The study recommends that governments and other stakeholders should provide incentives and support to encourage more youth to participate in farming activities. Farmers should prioritize their farming activities as their main source of income and livelihood. Farmers should ensure that their farming activities are not neglected or compromised in any way. The government should also reduce the cost of tariffs; transformers, solar, and other sources of electricity should be provided; and drill boreholes for farmers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
African Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Research
Published
2024-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62154/ajasfr.2024.017.010472
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determinants of Poverty among Farming Household in South-East Nigeria

Oladele Ayobami Afolabi, Taofeek Olajide Babarinde, Miriam Ngozi Offor, Toha Adewale Omonigba et al.
African Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Research
Agricultural risk and resilience
article

Determinants of Poverty among Farming Household in South-East Nigeria

Oladele Ayobami Afolabi, Taofeek Olajide Babarinde, Miriam Ngozi Offor, Toha Adewale Omonigba, Deborah Olachi Azino, Waliyat Titilayo Aremu
article en

Abstract

The study specifically profiled the socioeconomic characteristics, determined the level of poverty among farming households, and identified the determinant of poverty among farming households with descriptive statistics and a logistics regression model. General household survey secondary data was used. The data obtained was analyzed with descriptive statistics, such as mean, which was used to describe socio-economic characteristics of farming households, and the dimension of poverty among the farmers of 5 states was related by classifying the respondents into poor, moderately poor, and non-poor using the poverty line, and a logit model was used to examine the determinant of poverty among farming households in the southeast of Nigeria. Findings from the study revealed the average age of the respondent to be approximately 48 years. The mean household size is about 2, and the average income earned is about N24125. Age is negative and significantly influences household poverty status. Household size was found to be positive, and it significantly affected the poverty status of the farming household by 1%. Income from non-farm activities is positive, and it’s significant at 1%. Access to extension is positive and significant at 5%. Also, the source of electricity is positive, and it’s significant at 5%. Finally, the water source is positive, and it’s significant at 10%. The study recommends that governments and other stakeholders should provide incentives and support to encourage more youth to participate in farming activities. Farmers should prioritize their farming activities as their main source of income and livelihood. Farmers should ensure that their farming activities are not neglected or compromised in any way. The government should also reduce the cost of tariffs; transformers, solar, and other sources of electricity should be provided; and drill boreholes for farmers.

African Journal of Agricultural Science and Food ResearchVol. 17(1)
Ladoke Akintola University of Technology (NG)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Agricultural risk and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.