The pathologies of ‘tightening instruments’ used withrespect to value-added tax, as exemplified by the nationalreverse charge

<ns3:p>The article discusses the changes introduced in Poland’s value-added tax (VAT) between 2011 and 2020, particularlythe national reverse charge, whose declared purpose was to ‘tighten’ the tax, i.e. eliminate or close theloopholes in the VAT system, inhibit the mass-scale tax evasion and inhibit undue refunds of VAT. The authorargues that restricting the pathological effects of the tax concerned has only proved successful with but a part ofthe tightening instruments imposed in the said period whilst most of the mechanisms and/or procedures wereapparent actions. Added to which, the national reverse charge as introduced and extended in 2011–2019 has exacerbatedthe shortcomings of VAT, thus affecting its fiscal efficiency. The instrument in question has actuallyresulted in an elimination of the taxation of the actions covered by it and in increased refund amounts. The repealof national reverse charge in 2019 has been one of the major operations carried out in view of tightening the VAT.</ns3:p>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Doradztwo Podatkowe - Biuletyn Instytutu Studiów Podatkowych
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.8678
Primary Topic
Taxation and Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The pathologies of ‘tightening instruments’ used withrespect to value-added tax, as exemplified by the nationalreverse charge

Witold Modzelewski
Doradztwo Podatkowe - Biuletyn Instytutu Studiów Podatkowych
Taxation and Legal Issues
article

The pathologies of ‘tightening instruments’ used withrespect to value-added tax, as exemplified by the nationalreverse charge

Witold Modzelewski
article en

Abstract

<ns3:p>The article discusses the changes introduced in Poland’s value-added tax (VAT) between 2011 and 2020, particularlythe national reverse charge, whose declared purpose was to ‘tighten’ the tax, i.e. eliminate or close theloopholes in the VAT system, inhibit the mass-scale tax evasion and inhibit undue refunds of VAT. The authorargues that restricting the pathological effects of the tax concerned has only proved successful with but a part ofthe tightening instruments imposed in the said period whilst most of the mechanisms and/or procedures wereapparent actions. Added to which, the national reverse charge as introduced and extended in 2011–2019 has exacerbatedthe shortcomings of VAT, thus affecting its fiscal efficiency. The instrument in question has actuallyresulted in an elimination of the taxation of the actions covered by it and in increased refund amounts. The repealof national reverse charge in 2019 has been one of the major operations carried out in view of tightening the VAT.</ns3:p>

Doradztwo Podatkowe - Biuletyn Instytutu Studiów PodatkowychVol. 11(339)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Taxation and Legal Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The pathologies of ‘tightening instruments’ used withrespect to value-added tax, as exemplified by the nationalreverse charge — Witold Modzelewski · Doradztwo Podatkowe - Biuletyn Instytutu Studiów Podatkowych (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS