A comparative study on students' beliefs concerning their autonomy in doing mathematics

This paper treats an investigation on beliefs about autonomy held by 260 Finnish and 246 Italian seventh-grade students. The data were collected by means of a questionnaire consisting of 32 closed questions dealing with different aspects of mathematics teaching and learning, and three open questions on students' good and bad experiences in mathematics instruction and their wishes for good instruction. We have confined ourselves to the eight questions of the questionnaire identified as pertaining to the students' beliefs about autonomy in doing mathematics. The data was collected through the questionnaire allowed to outline the patterns of beliefs in each country and compare patterns with each other. We have identified a core of common patterns in the two countries which are mainly related to the issue of classroom interaction and to the students' need of their teacher's help. The biggest differences between the two countries were found in the items concerning the use of trial-and-error strategies and the possibility that the students solve mathematical problems on their own.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
NOMAD Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v8i4.146841
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study on students' beliefs concerning their autonomy in doing mathematics

Fulvia Furinghetti, Erkki Pehkonen
12 citations
NOMAD Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education
Education and Critical Thinking Development
2.10
article

A comparative study on students' beliefs concerning their autonomy in doing mathematics

Fulvia Furinghetti, Erkki Pehkonen
article en
12 citations

Abstract

This paper treats an investigation on beliefs about autonomy held by 260 Finnish and 246 Italian seventh-grade students. The data were collected by means of a questionnaire consisting of 32 closed questions dealing with different aspects of mathematics teaching and learning, and three open questions on students' good and bad experiences in mathematics instruction and their wishes for good instruction. We have confined ourselves to the eight questions of the questionnaire identified as pertaining to the students' beliefs about autonomy in doing mathematics. The data was collected through the questionnaire allowed to outline the patterns of beliefs in each country and compare patterns with each other. We have identified a core of common patterns in the two countries which are mainly related to the issue of classroom interaction and to the students' need of their teacher's help. The biggest differences between the two countries were found in the items concerning the use of trial-and-error strategies and the possibility that the students solve mathematical problems on their own.

NOMAD Nordic Studies in Mathematics EducationVol. 8(4)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.