Methodological considerations on investigating teachers’ beliefs of mathematics and its teaching

Our primary concerns are the methodological considerations on investigating teachers’ beliefs of mathematics teaching using a quantitative as well as qualitative approach. However, a discussion of this type cannot be completely detached from the textual determination that beliefs result from. Hereby, Dionne’s and Ernest’s characterizations of beliefs on mathematics served as a theoretical background; the dominant perspectives on mathematics can be described as toolbox aspect, system aspect and process aspect. Originally, our test subjects numbered a total of 13 experienced German mathematics teachers. However, we will limit the scope of the discussion to research on six representative persons. We used three data-gathering methods: questionnaires, videotaped interviews and graphical as well as numerical self-estimations, respectively. In our investigation a comparison of the self-estimations stands in the foreground. Since this information is mainly overlapping, partly redundant and likely contradictory, we have to question the data in order to describe the beliefs of the teachers. The research was conducted during the spring and summer of 1994.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
NOMAD Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v9i1.147060
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methodological considerations on investigating teachers’ beliefs of mathematics and its teaching

Günter Törner, Erkki Pehkonen
9 citations
NOMAD Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education
Education and Critical Thinking Development
2.10
article

Methodological considerations on investigating teachers’ beliefs of mathematics and its teaching

Günter Törner, Erkki Pehkonen
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Our primary concerns are the methodological considerations on investigating teachers’ beliefs of mathematics teaching using a quantitative as well as qualitative approach. However, a discussion of this type cannot be completely detached from the textual determination that beliefs result from. Hereby, Dionne’s and Ernest’s characterizations of beliefs on mathematics served as a theoretical background; the dominant perspectives on mathematics can be described as toolbox aspect, system aspect and process aspect. Originally, our test subjects numbered a total of 13 experienced German mathematics teachers. However, we will limit the scope of the discussion to research on six representative persons. We used three data-gathering methods: questionnaires, videotaped interviews and graphical as well as numerical self-estimations, respectively. In our investigation a comparison of the self-estimations stands in the foreground. Since this information is mainly overlapping, partly redundant and likely contradictory, we have to question the data in order to describe the beliefs of the teachers. The research was conducted during the spring and summer of 1994.

NOMAD Nordic Studies in Mathematics EducationVol. 9(1)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.