Classifying Dry Eye Disease Patients from Healthy Controls Using Machine Learning and Metabolomics Data

<b>Background:</b> Dry eye disease is a common disorder of the ocular surface, leading patients to seek eye care. Clinical signs and symptoms are currently used to diagnose dry eye disease. Metabolomics, a method for analyzing biological systems, has been found helpful in identifying distinct metabolites in patients and in detecting metabolic profiles that may indicate dry eye disease at early stages. In this study, we explored the use of machine learning and metabolomics data to identify cataract patients who suffer from dry eye disease, a topic that, to our knowledge, has not been previously explored. As there is no one-size-fits-all machine learning model for metabolomics data, choosing the most suitable model can significantly affect the quality of predictions and subsequent metabolomics analyses. <b>Methods:</b> To address this challenge, we conducted a comparative analysis of eight machine learning models on two metabolomics data sets from cataract patients with and without dry eye disease. The models were evaluated and optimized using nested k-fold cross-validation. To assess the performance of these models, we selected a set of suitable evaluation metrics tailored to the data set's challenges. <b>Results:</b> The logistic regression model overall performed the best, achieving the highest area under the curve score of 0.8378, balanced accuracy of 0.735, Matthew's correlation coefficient of 0.5147, an F1-score of 0.8513, and a specificity of 0.5667. Additionally, following the logistic regression, the XGBoost and Random Forest models also demonstrated good performance. <b>Conclusions:</b> The results show that the logistic regression model with L2 regularization can outperform more complex models on an imbalanced data set with a small sample size and a high number of features, while also avoiding overfitting and delivering consistent performance across cross-validation folds. Additionally, the results demonstrate that it is possible to identify dry eye in cataract patients from tear film metabolomics data using machine learning models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14232696
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classifying Dry Eye Disease Patients from Healthy Controls Using Machine Learning and Metabolomics Data

Hugo L. Hammer, Øygunn Aass Utheim, Katja Benedikte Prestø Elgstøen, Helge Rootwelt et al.
6 citations
Diagnostics
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
3.26
article

Classifying Dry Eye Disease Patients from Healthy Controls Using Machine Learning and Metabolomics Data

Hugo L. Hammer, Øygunn Aass Utheim, Katja Benedikte Prestø Elgstøen, Helge Rootwelt, Kjell Gunnar Gundersen, Sajad Amouei Sheshkal, Morten Gundersen, Michael A. Riegler
article en
6 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Dry eye disease is a common disorder of the ocular surface, leading patients to seek eye care. Clinical signs and symptoms are currently used to diagnose dry eye disease. Metabolomics, a method for analyzing biological systems, has been found helpful in identifying distinct metabolites in patients and in detecting metabolic profiles that may indicate dry eye disease at early stages. In this study, we explored the use of machine learning and metabolomics data to identify cataract patients who suffer from dry eye disease, a topic that, to our knowledge, has not been previously explored. As there is no one-size-fits-all machine learning model for metabolomics data, choosing the most suitable model can significantly affect the quality of predictions and subsequent metabolomics analyses. <b>Methods:</b> To address this challenge, we conducted a comparative analysis of eight machine learning models on two metabolomics data sets from cataract patients with and without dry eye disease. The models were evaluated and optimized using nested k-fold cross-validation. To assess the performance of these models, we selected a set of suitable evaluation metrics tailored to the data set's challenges. <b>Results:</b> The logistic regression model overall performed the best, achieving the highest area under the curve score of 0.8378, balanced accuracy of 0.735, Matthew's correlation coefficient of 0.5147, an F1-score of 0.8513, and a specificity of 0.5667. Additionally, following the logistic regression, the XGBoost and Random Forest models also demonstrated good performance. <b>Conclusions:</b> The results show that the logistic regression model with L2 regularization can outperform more complex models on an imbalanced data set with a small sample size and a high number of features, while also avoiding overfitting and delivering consistent performance across cross-validation folds. Additionally, the results demonstrate that it is possible to identify dry eye in cataract patients from tear film metabolomics data using machine learning models.

DiagnosticsVol. 14(23)
Oslo University Hospital (NO), OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), Privatsykehuset Haugesund (NO), Simula Metropolitan Center for Digital Engineering (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
3.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.