Predictors of Malignant Lymph Node Involvement in paediatric patients: Analysis of 217 Cases

Introduction. Diagnosing cervical lymphadenopathy in children with a history of oncological or immunopathological conditions is challenging, often resulting in overtreatment. This study analyses ultrasound-based differential diagnostics for lymphadenopathy in this patient group. Aim. To improve diagnostic accuracy for cervical lymphadenopathy in children with a history of oncological or immunopathological conditions. Materials and methods . A retrospective analysis was performed on clinical and demographic data from 217 paediatric patients diagnosed with cervical lymphadenopathy. These patients underwent excisional lymph node biopsy and/or lymphadenectomy between December 2017 and December 2022. The cohort was divided into Group A (benign lymphadenopathy; n = 92) and Group B (malignant lymphadenopathy; n = 125). Results. Significant predictors of malignant lymphadenopathy were identified, including “Lymph Node Configuration Index ≤ 2” (increasing the odds by 4.4–5.1 times), “Short Axis of Lymph Node > 10 mm” (OR 2.5–2.8), “Specific Therapy Prior to Lymph Node Removal” (OR 6.9–7.2), “Absence of Lymph Node Differentiation” (OR 2.2–2.4), “Presence of Intranodal Microcalcifications” (OR 14.1–16.3), “Increased Vascularisation of the Lymph Node” (OR 2.0–2.6), “Overall Hypoechogenicity” (OR 2.4), and “Formation of Conglomerates” (OR 3.6). Predictive models integrating these factors demonstrated strong accuracy, with an informational capacity of 81.1% (p < 0.001), sensitivity between 79.3% and 82.6%, and specificity from 80.0% to 82.4%. Discussion. The comprehensive analysis of predictive factors for malignant lymphadenopathy in patients with a history of oncological or immunopathological diseases suggests that no single ultrasound risk factor should be the sole basis for differential diagnosis, supporting earlier findings. Conclusion. The predictive models provide a standardised, robust approach for assessing malignant lymph node involvement, improving diagnostic accuracy in paediatric patients with oncological or immunopathological histories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2024-439
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Lymphadenopathy Diagnosis and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictors of Malignant Lymph Node Involvement in paediatric patients: Analysis of 217 Cases

Николай Сергеевич Грачев, R. S. Oganesyan, G. A. Polev, E. Yu. Yaremenko
1 citations
Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council
Lymphadenopathy Diagnosis and Analysis
0.57
article

Predictors of Malignant Lymph Node Involvement in paediatric patients: Analysis of 217 Cases

Николай Сергеевич Грачев, R. S. Oganesyan, G. A. Polev, E. Yu. Yaremenko
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction. Diagnosing cervical lymphadenopathy in children with a history of oncological or immunopathological conditions is challenging, often resulting in overtreatment. This study analyses ultrasound-based differential diagnostics for lymphadenopathy in this patient group. Aim. To improve diagnostic accuracy for cervical lymphadenopathy in children with a history of oncological or immunopathological conditions. Materials and methods . A retrospective analysis was performed on clinical and demographic data from 217 paediatric patients diagnosed with cervical lymphadenopathy. These patients underwent excisional lymph node biopsy and/or lymphadenectomy between December 2017 and December 2022. The cohort was divided into Group A (benign lymphadenopathy; n = 92) and Group B (malignant lymphadenopathy; n = 125). Results. Significant predictors of malignant lymphadenopathy were identified, including “Lymph Node Configuration Index ≤ 2” (increasing the odds by 4.4–5.1 times), “Short Axis of Lymph Node > 10 mm” (OR 2.5–2.8), “Specific Therapy Prior to Lymph Node Removal” (OR 6.9–7.2), “Absence of Lymph Node Differentiation” (OR 2.2–2.4), “Presence of Intranodal Microcalcifications” (OR 14.1–16.3), “Increased Vascularisation of the Lymph Node” (OR 2.0–2.6), “Overall Hypoechogenicity” (OR 2.4), and “Formation of Conglomerates” (OR 3.6). Predictive models integrating these factors demonstrated strong accuracy, with an informational capacity of 81.1% (p < 0.001), sensitivity between 79.3% and 82.6%, and specificity from 80.0% to 82.4%. Discussion. The comprehensive analysis of predictive factors for malignant lymphadenopathy in patients with a history of oncological or immunopathological diseases suggests that no single ultrasound risk factor should be the sole basis for differential diagnosis, supporting earlier findings. Conclusion. The predictive models provide a standardised, robust approach for assessing malignant lymph node involvement, improving diagnostic accuracy in paediatric patients with oncological or immunopathological histories.

Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council(19)
Center for Children (US), Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Lymphadenopathy Diagnosis and Analysis
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.