Anonymity in Dealer-to-Customer Markets

We use a laboratory experiment to explore the effect of a change in pre-trade anonymity in a quote-driven dealer-to-customer market, organised as a request for quote (RFQ). We consider two treatments in which dealers interact with two types of customers (informed or uninformed). In the first treatment, there is no anonymity: dealers know whether the customer that sent them the request for quote is informed or uninformed. In the second treatment, there is complete anonymity: dealers do not know the type of customers they are interacting with. We find that anonymity improves price efficiency, whereas it does not adversely impact dealers’ trading profits. Our results contribute to the debate on transparency versus the adoption of anonymity in financial markets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Financial Studies
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs12040119
Primary Topic
Securities Regulation and Market Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anonymity in Dealer-to-Customer Markets

Emanuela Sciubba, Paola Paiardini, Daniela Teresa Di Cagno
International Journal of Financial Studies
Securities Regulation and Market Practices
article

Anonymity in Dealer-to-Customer Markets

Emanuela Sciubba, Paola Paiardini, Daniela Teresa Di Cagno
article en

Abstract

We use a laboratory experiment to explore the effect of a change in pre-trade anonymity in a quote-driven dealer-to-customer market, organised as a request for quote (RFQ). We consider two treatments in which dealers interact with two types of customers (informed or uninformed). In the first treatment, there is no anonymity: dealers know whether the customer that sent them the request for quote is informed or uninformed. In the second treatment, there is complete anonymity: dealers do not know the type of customers they are interacting with. We find that anonymity improves price efficiency, whereas it does not adversely impact dealers’ trading profits. Our results contribute to the debate on transparency versus the adoption of anonymity in financial markets.

International Journal of Financial StudiesVol. 12(4)
Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Securities Regulation and Market Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.