Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Shade-Affected Stream Temperatures

This study evaluates the selection of predictor variables for machine learning (ML) models of stream temperatures affected by riparian shading. Two scenarios of model development were examined—ML models for the prediction of shade-affected stream temperatures at monitored locations (i.e., temporal prediction) and ML models for the prediction of shade-affected stream temperatures at unmonitored locations (i.e., spatial prediction) using data from the watershed’s nearby monitored gages. Notably, this study goes beyond previous research by examining the inclusion of riparian vegetation as a predictor variable alongside other commonly assessed predictors. The ultimate goal was to identify the optimal number of predictors as well as key predictors for developing efficient ML models in terms of accuracy and complexity. Two stations in the Dairy McKay Watershed (DMW) with long-term stream-temperature records were used to develop the temporal prediction ML models. For spatial prediction ML models, data from 29 monitored sites along the DMW were utilized. A total of 33 variables were analyzed, but variables exhibiting no temporal variation were excluded from temporal prediction ML models. The study revealed that ML models achieved reliable predictions with fewer predictors, reducing feature needs. Results showed that for temporal prediction ML models, a subset of four predictors (air temperature, stream flow, day of the year, and shade factor) resulted in the simplest model, with average RMSE values ranging between 0.78 and 0.88. For spatial prediction ML models, the simplest model consisted of six predictors excluding the shade factor, achieving an average RMSE of 0.54. Including riparian vegetation as a key predictor in temporal prediction ML models enabled us to assess its impact on mitigating stream-temperature rise. Thus, evaluation of three riparian vegetation scenarios using temporal prediction ML models showed their significant impact on lowering stream temperatures, aligning with physically based models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jhyeff.heeng-6227
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Shade-Affected Stream Temperatures

Meghna Babbar‐Sebens, Chris E. Jordan, Efrain Noa‐Yarasca
5 citations
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
1.03
article

Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Shade-Affected Stream Temperatures

Meghna Babbar‐Sebens, Chris E. Jordan, Efrain Noa‐Yarasca
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates the selection of predictor variables for machine learning (ML) models of stream temperatures affected by riparian shading. Two scenarios of model development were examined—ML models for the prediction of shade-affected stream temperatures at monitored locations (i.e., temporal prediction) and ML models for the prediction of shade-affected stream temperatures at unmonitored locations (i.e., spatial prediction) using data from the watershed’s nearby monitored gages. Notably, this study goes beyond previous research by examining the inclusion of riparian vegetation as a predictor variable alongside other commonly assessed predictors. The ultimate goal was to identify the optimal number of predictors as well as key predictors for developing efficient ML models in terms of accuracy and complexity. Two stations in the Dairy McKay Watershed (DMW) with long-term stream-temperature records were used to develop the temporal prediction ML models. For spatial prediction ML models, data from 29 monitored sites along the DMW were utilized. A total of 33 variables were analyzed, but variables exhibiting no temporal variation were excluded from temporal prediction ML models. The study revealed that ML models achieved reliable predictions with fewer predictors, reducing feature needs. Results showed that for temporal prediction ML models, a subset of four predictors (air temperature, stream flow, day of the year, and shade factor) resulted in the simplest model, with average RMSE values ranging between 0.78 and 0.88. For spatial prediction ML models, the simplest model consisted of six predictors excluding the shade factor, achieving an average RMSE of 0.54. Including riparian vegetation as a key predictor in temporal prediction ML models enabled us to assess its impact on mitigating stream-temperature rise. Thus, evaluation of three riparian vegetation scenarios using temporal prediction ML models showed their significant impact on lowering stream temperatures, aligning with physically based models.

Journal of Hydrologic EngineeringVol. 30(1)
Oregon State University (US), NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Northwest Fisheries Science Center (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
1.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.