Process evaluation of a health- and fitness-related physical education program

Abstract Objective The aim of this process evaluation study was to investigate fidelity, acceptance, applicability and movement time with respect to the health- and fitness-related GEKOS program ( Förderung bewegungsbezogener Gesundheitskompetenz im Sportunterricht ) linking theory and practice in physical education. Methods Fidelity was investigated by observation, self-report forms and poster documentations. Applicability and students’ ( n = 472) and teachers’ ( n = 27) acceptance were examined by qualitative interviews and surveys directly after the GEKOS program. Movement time was assessed using accelerometer data and compared to students’ ( n = 369) movement time in regular physical education classes. Results Overall, fidelity was high and statements in the interviews and surveys with regard to applicability and acceptance were heterogeneous. Particularly critical was the low net movement time, which was assessed using device-based accelerometer data. Conclusion The results allowed us to identify barriers such as standardization and facilitators such as teachers’ acceptance of teaching student-centered approaches. Therefore, flexibility in the delivery of programs and the balance between net time moving and theoretical cognitive activating content in PE need to be discussed further in terms of long-term implementation of such a program.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-024-01002-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Physical Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Process evaluation of a health- and fitness-related physical education program

Ansgar Thiel, Stephanie Rosenstiel, Brit Teutemacher, Carmen Volk et al.
1 citations
German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research
Physical Education and Pedagogy
1.15
article

Process evaluation of a health- and fitness-related physical education program

Ansgar Thiel, Stephanie Rosenstiel, Brit Teutemacher, Carmen Volk, Gorden Sudeck, Yolanda Demetriou, Maike Dernbach
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objective The aim of this process evaluation study was to investigate fidelity, acceptance, applicability and movement time with respect to the health- and fitness-related GEKOS program ( Förderung bewegungsbezogener Gesundheitskompetenz im Sportunterricht ) linking theory and practice in physical education. Methods Fidelity was investigated by observation, self-report forms and poster documentations. Applicability and students’ ( n = 472) and teachers’ ( n = 27) acceptance were examined by qualitative interviews and surveys directly after the GEKOS program. Movement time was assessed using accelerometer data and compared to students’ ( n = 369) movement time in regular physical education classes. Results Overall, fidelity was high and statements in the interviews and surveys with regard to applicability and acceptance were heterogeneous. Particularly critical was the low net movement time, which was assessed using device-based accelerometer data. Conclusion The results allowed us to identify barriers such as standardization and facilitators such as teachers’ acceptance of teaching student-centered approaches. Therefore, flexibility in the delivery of programs and the balance between net time moving and theoretical cognitive activating content in PE need to be discussed further in terms of long-term implementation of such a program.

German Journal of Exercise and Sport ResearchVol. 55(2)
German Sport University Cologne (DE), DVGW-Forschungsstelle am Engler-Bunte-Institut des Karlsruher Instituts für Technologie (DE), University of Tübingen (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Physical Education and Pedagogy
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.