Evaluation of the CellaVision® DM-1200 system for detecting and quantifying schistocytes

Detection of schistocytes is an important first step in the differential diagnosis of thrombotic microangiopathy. It is however labor intensive and prone to subjectivity. To improve and standardize the detection and quantification of schistocytes, we studied its automated analysis by digital microscopy DM1200 (CellaVision®) on 63 positive and 102 negative smears obtained from SP-50 (Sysmex®). Easy to use and very useful for staff training, it showed a lower between-observer coefficient of variation than usually described for manual counting (25% vs. 50%). Very sensitive (100%) in pre-classification, the detection of schistocytes was highly sensitive (98.4%) and specific (96.8%) after reclassification (AUCROC = 0.9929), showing a good correlation with manual microscopy. TAT was comparable to manual counting. For positive smears, the percentage of schistocytes was similar between pre- and post-classification. However, 29.6% of pre-classified schistocytes were removed and 21.8% were added. For negative smears a significative overestimation of schistocytes (292%) was observed. Except poikilocytosis, on negative smears, the most common error of the software (24.9%) was due to platelets classified in schistocytes. Were also observed for example erroneous divisions of the image (3.2%) or artifactual schistocytes resulting from scratches in the smear (2.6%). Another limit is the high number of red blood cells not analyzed (46.8% for high-density smears), which might false the schistocytes percentage. To conclude, CellaVision® technology showed many benefits, but also limits that the operator needs to know.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Annales de biologie clinique
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1684/abc.2024.1921
Primary Topic
Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the CellaVision® DM-1200 system for detecting and quantifying schistocytes

Sami Zouitina, Frédérique Dubois-Galopin
Annales de biologie clinique
Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
article

Evaluation of the CellaVision® DM-1200 system for detecting and quantifying schistocytes

Sami Zouitina, Frédérique Dubois-Galopin
article en

Abstract

Detection of schistocytes is an important first step in the differential diagnosis of thrombotic microangiopathy. It is however labor intensive and prone to subjectivity. To improve and standardize the detection and quantification of schistocytes, we studied its automated analysis by digital microscopy DM1200 (CellaVision®) on 63 positive and 102 negative smears obtained from SP-50 (Sysmex®). Easy to use and very useful for staff training, it showed a lower between-observer coefficient of variation than usually described for manual counting (25% vs. 50%). Very sensitive (100%) in pre-classification, the detection of schistocytes was highly sensitive (98.4%) and specific (96.8%) after reclassification (AUCROC = 0.9929), showing a good correlation with manual microscopy. TAT was comparable to manual counting. For positive smears, the percentage of schistocytes was similar between pre- and post-classification. However, 29.6% of pre-classified schistocytes were removed and 21.8% were added. For negative smears a significative overestimation of schistocytes (292%) was observed. Except poikilocytosis, on negative smears, the most common error of the software (24.9%) was due to platelets classified in schistocytes. Were also observed for example erroneous divisions of the image (3.2%) or artifactual schistocytes resulting from scratches in the smear (2.6%). Another limit is the high number of red blood cells not analyzed (46.8% for high-density smears), which might false the schistocytes percentage. To conclude, CellaVision® technology showed many benefits, but also limits that the operator needs to know.

Annales de biologie cliniqueVol. 82(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.