Sensitivity Sampling for $k$-Means: Worst Case and Stability Optimal Coreset Bounds

Coresets are arguably the most popular compression paradigm for center-based clustering objectives such as <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k$</tex>-means. Given a point set <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$P$</tex>, a coreset <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\Omega$</tex> is a small, weighted summary that preserves the cost of all candidate solutions <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$S$</tex> up to a <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$(1\pm\varepsilon)$</tex> factor. For <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k$</tex>-means in <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$d$</tex>-dimensional Euclidean space the cost for solution <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$S$</tex> is <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\Sigma_{p\in P}{\min}_{s\in S}\Vert p-s\Vert ^2$</tex>. A very popular method for coreset construction, both in theory and practice, is Sensitivity Sampling, where points are sampled in proportion to their importance. We show that Sensitivity Sampling yields optimal coresets of size <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\widetilde{O}(k/\varepsilon^{2}\min(\sqrt{k},\varepsilon^{-2}))$</tex> for worst-case instances. Uniquely among all known coreset algorithms, for well-clusterable data sets with <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\Omega(1)$</tex>, cost stability, Sensitivity Sampling gives coresets of size <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\widetilde{O}(k/\varepsilon^{2})$</tex>, improving over the worst-case lower bound. Notably, Sensitivity Sampling does not have to know the cost stability in order to exploit it: it is appropriately sensitive to the clusterability of the data set while being oblivious to it. We also show that any coreset for stable instances consisting of only input points must have size <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\Omega(k/\varepsilon^{2})$</tex>. Our results for Sensitivity Sampling also extend to the k-median problem, and more general metric spaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/focs61266.2024.00106
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivity Sampling for $k$-Means: Worst Case and Stability Optimal Coreset Bounds

Milind Prabhu, David Saulpic, Nikhil Bansal, Vincent Cohen-Addad et al.
1 citations
Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
0.37
article

Sensitivity Sampling for $k$-Means: Worst Case and Stability Optimal Coreset Bounds

Milind Prabhu, David Saulpic, Nikhil Bansal, Vincent Cohen-Addad, Chris Schwiegelshohn
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Coresets are arguably the most popular compression paradigm for center-based clustering objectives such as <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k$</tex>-means. Given a point set <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$P$</tex>, a coreset <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\Omega$</tex> is a small, weighted summary that preserves the cost of all candidate solutions <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$S$</tex> up to a <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$(1\pm\varepsilon)$</tex> factor. For <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k$</tex>-means in <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$d$</tex>-dimensional Euclidean space the cost for solution <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$S$</tex> is <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\Sigma_{p\in P}{\min}_{s\in S}\Vert p-s\Vert ^2$</tex>. A very popular method for coreset construction, both in theory and practice, is Sensitivity Sampling, where points are sampled in proportion to their importance. We show that Sensitivity Sampling yields optimal coresets of size <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\widetilde{O}(k/\varepsilon^{2}\min(\sqrt{k},\varepsilon^{-2}))$</tex> for worst-case instances. Uniquely among all known coreset algorithms, for well-clusterable data sets with <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\Omega(1)$</tex>, cost stability, Sensitivity Sampling gives coresets of size <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\widetilde{O}(k/\varepsilon^{2})$</tex>, improving over the worst-case lower bound. Notably, Sensitivity Sampling does not have to know the cost stability in order to exploit it: it is appropriately sensitive to the clusterability of the data set while being oblivious to it. We also show that any coreset for stable instances consisting of only input points must have size <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\Omega(k/\varepsilon^{2})$</tex>. Our results for Sensitivity Sampling also extend to the k-median problem, and more general metric spaces.

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Aarhus University (DK), University of Michigan (US)
National Science Foundation, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.