Navigating spatial justice: Exploring municipal planners’ logics in differentiated village planning

An amendment to the Danish Planning Act in 2019 mandated municipalities to incorporate strategies for the differentiated development of viable villages. This marks the first national initiative in Denmark requiring strategic village development within statutory municipal planning. While municipalities have considerable freedom to adapt these strategies to local conditions, existing plans, and ongoing projects, this new requirement has led to diverse approaches to strategic planning across the country. Drawing on data from 37 qualitative interviews with planners in Danish rural municipalities, we analyse how planners differentiate between villages at the municipal level, basing their decisions on both institutional and structural factors. We introduce a spatial justice matrix, encompassing dimensions of procedural and distributive justice alongside principles of equality and equity, to illustrate how municipalities' strategies for village development embody distinct interpretations of spatial justice. Some municipalities adopt a participatory, demand-driven approach, akin to a "first come, first served" principle, while others prioritize local service provision to distribute resources more equitably in line with targeted development objectives. Although each approach aligns with a different interpretation of spatial justice, these variations raise critical questions about the meaning and attainment of spatial justice in practice. As municipalities navigate these interpretations, disparities in development outcomes emerge across municipalities, highlighting a need for further discussion on inter-municipal equity and cooperation. • Planners apply different logics when differentiating between villages for development. • A spatial justice framework is developed to discuss differences in planning strategies. • Villages are not evaluated on the same parameters, resulting in strategies with different outcomes. • To ensure rural spatial justice village planning needs greater focus on inter-municipal corporation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103496
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Rural development and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating spatial justice: Exploring municipal planners’ logics in differentiated village planning

Kasper Friis Bavnbæk, Annette Aagaard Thuesen
3 citations
Journal of Rural Studies
Rural development and sustainability
4.03
article

Navigating spatial justice: Exploring municipal planners’ logics in differentiated village planning

Kasper Friis Bavnbæk, Annette Aagaard Thuesen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

An amendment to the Danish Planning Act in 2019 mandated municipalities to incorporate strategies for the differentiated development of viable villages. This marks the first national initiative in Denmark requiring strategic village development within statutory municipal planning. While municipalities have considerable freedom to adapt these strategies to local conditions, existing plans, and ongoing projects, this new requirement has led to diverse approaches to strategic planning across the country. Drawing on data from 37 qualitative interviews with planners in Danish rural municipalities, we analyse how planners differentiate between villages at the municipal level, basing their decisions on both institutional and structural factors. We introduce a spatial justice matrix, encompassing dimensions of procedural and distributive justice alongside principles of equality and equity, to illustrate how municipalities' strategies for village development embody distinct interpretations of spatial justice. Some municipalities adopt a participatory, demand-driven approach, akin to a "first come, first served" principle, while others prioritize local service provision to distribute resources more equitably in line with targeted development objectives. Although each approach aligns with a different interpretation of spatial justice, these variations raise critical questions about the meaning and attainment of spatial justice in practice. As municipalities navigate these interpretations, disparities in development outcomes emerge across municipalities, highlighting a need for further discussion on inter-municipal equity and cooperation. • Planners apply different logics when differentiating between villages for development. • A spatial justice framework is developed to discuss differences in planning strategies. • Villages are not evaluated on the same parameters, resulting in strategies with different outcomes. • To ensure rural spatial justice village planning needs greater focus on inter-municipal corporation.

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 114
University of Southern Denmark (DK), School of Business and Management (FR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Rural development and sustainability
4.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.