A Commentary on Miron et al. (2024): Resolving Identity Conflicts Through Identity Integration and Expansion

The focal article (Miron et al., 2024) asks the important question of how gender influences the effect of managerial power on actions to promote gender equality in the workplace. The authors propose that holding conflicting identities (i.e., gender identity and managerial identity) may lead to differential justice standards. While we agree with the fundamental propositions made in the focal article, we highlight the authors’ either/or identity framework and narrow view of self-schema content as two issues that may be resolved by taking a more complex perspective on identity within the workplace. We specifically propose that by considering the intersection, integration, and breadth of multiple complex identities we can better understand how multiple identities combine to create a more holistic sense of self.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Group & Organization Management
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011241303979
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Commentary on Miron et al. (2024): Resolving Identity Conflicts Through Identity Integration and Expansion

Michelle Hammond, Gregory R. Thrasher, Benjamin Biermeier‐Hanson
1 citations
Group & Organization Management
Social and Intergroup Psychology
1.13
article

A Commentary on Miron et al. (2024): Resolving Identity Conflicts Through Identity Integration and Expansion

Michelle Hammond, Gregory R. Thrasher, Benjamin Biermeier‐Hanson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The focal article (Miron et al., 2024) asks the important question of how gender influences the effect of managerial power on actions to promote gender equality in the workplace. The authors propose that holding conflicting identities (i.e., gender identity and managerial identity) may lead to differential justice standards. While we agree with the fundamental propositions made in the focal article, we highlight the authors’ either/or identity framework and narrow view of self-schema content as two issues that may be resolved by taking a more complex perspective on identity within the workplace. We specifically propose that by considering the intersection, integration, and breadth of multiple complex identities we can better understand how multiple identities combine to create a more holistic sense of self.

Group & Organization ManagementVol. 50(4)
Oakland University (US), Radford University (US)
Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.