Retrenchment without effect? Exploring the link between pension reforms and public pension adequacy of new retirees in seven European countries (1993–2020)

Since the 1980s population ageing and economic change has led to cost-containing pension reforms in many industrialized countries. Research has focused on the institutional side of such reforms, but the impact of cost containment policies for real retirees’ pensions remains under-researched. This study addresses this gap. We use the change in projected pension replacement rates for average earners established by the OECD (2002–2019) as an indicator of institutional retrenchment and compare this with the change in the ‘relative pension level’ of real pensioners covering the period 1993–2020 across seven European countries. With data from five waves of the Luxembourg Income Survey and linear regression models we examine whether the average pension income from public and mandatory systems, expressed in relation to average wages (‘relative pension level’), of individuals in the earliest wave, least affected by institutional retrenchment, were significantly different from those of the later waves. The analysis was repeated for subgroups of men and women. We find that institutional change is no reliable predictor of relative pension level change. In the five countries where institutional retrenchment happened, real pension levels fell in only two, in the two countries where they increased no significant change in pension levels occurred. Women’s relative pensions have been more consistent with the expectations of the institutional reform literature than men’s. Our results suggest other variables have mediated the relationship between institutions and pension outcomes, most probably employment change. We conclude that outcome-based analysis is an essential complement to institutional approaches. For policymakers the long-term impact of pension reform is hard to predict, but our results suggest that relative real pension income has been more robust than feared by many.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of European Social Policy
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09589287241300024
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Retrenchment without effect? Exploring the link between pension reforms and public pension adequacy of new retirees in seven European countries (1993–2020)

Traute Meyer, Paul Bridgen, Lisa Davison
1 citations
Journal of European Social Policy
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
1.71
article

Retrenchment without effect? Exploring the link between pension reforms and public pension adequacy of new retirees in seven European countries (1993–2020)

Traute Meyer, Paul Bridgen, Lisa Davison
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Since the 1980s population ageing and economic change has led to cost-containing pension reforms in many industrialized countries. Research has focused on the institutional side of such reforms, but the impact of cost containment policies for real retirees’ pensions remains under-researched. This study addresses this gap. We use the change in projected pension replacement rates for average earners established by the OECD (2002–2019) as an indicator of institutional retrenchment and compare this with the change in the ‘relative pension level’ of real pensioners covering the period 1993–2020 across seven European countries. With data from five waves of the Luxembourg Income Survey and linear regression models we examine whether the average pension income from public and mandatory systems, expressed in relation to average wages (‘relative pension level’), of individuals in the earliest wave, least affected by institutional retrenchment, were significantly different from those of the later waves. The analysis was repeated for subgroups of men and women. We find that institutional change is no reliable predictor of relative pension level change. In the five countries where institutional retrenchment happened, real pension levels fell in only two, in the two countries where they increased no significant change in pension levels occurred. Women’s relative pensions have been more consistent with the expectations of the institutional reform literature than men’s. Our results suggest other variables have mediated the relationship between institutions and pension outcomes, most probably employment change. We conclude that outcome-based analysis is an essential complement to institutional approaches. For policymakers the long-term impact of pension reform is hard to predict, but our results suggest that relative real pension income has been more robust than feared by many.

Journal of European Social PolicyVol. 35(2)
University of Stirling (GB), University of Southampton (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
1.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.