Biotechnology or bioeconomy: Six of one and half a dozen of the other?

Different views and definitions pertain to the concept of bioeconomy. Few propose a workable definition enabling scholars and decision makers to identify analyze and manage the bioeconomy. Two technological delineations based on patent IPC codes delimitate a bioeconomy based on biotechnology inventions or based on a broader set of technologies. The two definitions are applied to two samples of firms, one with biotech firms and one with biorefineries that are considered by scholars as core to the bioeconomy. The relevance of these definitions for identifying the innovation practices of bioeconomy companies and reporting on their development of sustainable activities is assessed. • This article models the knowledge base of the bioeconomy, comparing the biotechnology and biorefinery approaches. • This modelisation is based on an original compilation of bioeconomy patents and a new database of biorefineries worldwide. • Very few of the technologies developed in the bioeconomy can be classified as green technologies. • The bioeconomy fails to deliver on its promises of innovation and sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Economics
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108470
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biotechnology or bioeconomy: Six of one and half a dozen of the other?

Nicolas Béfort, Stéphane Lhuillery, Samih Atmane
6 citations
Ecological Economics
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
8.05
article

Biotechnology or bioeconomy: Six of one and half a dozen of the other?

Nicolas Béfort, Stéphane Lhuillery, Samih Atmane
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Different views and definitions pertain to the concept of bioeconomy. Few propose a workable definition enabling scholars and decision makers to identify analyze and manage the bioeconomy. Two technological delineations based on patent IPC codes delimitate a bioeconomy based on biotechnology inventions or based on a broader set of technologies. The two definitions are applied to two samples of firms, one with biotech firms and one with biorefineries that are considered by scholars as core to the bioeconomy. The relevance of these definitions for identifying the innovation practices of bioeconomy companies and reporting on their development of sustainable activities is assessed. • This article models the knowledge base of the bioeconomy, comparing the biotechnology and biorefinery approaches. • This modelisation is based on an original compilation of bioeconomy patents and a new database of biorefineries worldwide. • Very few of the technologies developed in the bioeconomy can be classified as green technologies. • The bioeconomy fails to deliver on its promises of innovation and sustainability.

Ecological EconomicsVol. 229
Ministry of Economy and Finance (ML), NEOMA Business School (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
8.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Biotechnology or bioeconomy: Six of one and half a dozen of the other? — Nicolas Béfort, Stéphane Lhuillery, et al. · Ecological Economics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS