The effect of female breast surface area on cutaneous thermal sensation, wetness perception and epidermal properties

Female development includes significant size changes across the breast. Yet, whether differences in breast surface area (BrSA) modify breast sensitivity to warm, cold and wetness, and the associated epidermal properties (skin thickness and surface roughness) remain unclear. We investigated the relationship between BrSA and thermal and wetness perception, as well as epidermal properties, in 21 females (28 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$\ \pm $</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> 10 years) of varying breast sizes (BrSA range: 147-502 cm<sup>2</sup>), at multiple breast sites (i.e., nipple, above and below the nipple, and bra triangle). Associations between BrSA and the perceptual and epidermal variables were determined via correlation analyses. Differences across test sites were assessed by repeated-measures ANOVA. Our results did not support the hypothesis that larger breasts present reduced thermal and wetness sensitivity, except for the above nipple site, which presented reduced warm sensitivity with increasing BrSA (r = -0.61, P = 0.003). We also found a heterogeneous distribution of cold, but not warm or wetness, sensitivity across the breast, with the above nipple site presenting lower cold sensitivity than any other site (P < 0.015). Our findings did not indicate any association between BrSA and epidermal properties (thickness and roughness), nor any site-dependent variation in these anatomical parameters (P > 0.15). We conclude that, while some skin-site (i.e., above the nipple) and perceptual modality-dependent (i.e., warm sensitivity) differences were observed, BrSA-dependent variations in thermal and wetness sensitivity were not a generalised feature of the skin covering the breast. These observations advance our fundamental understanding of breast sensory function, and they could inform the design of user-centred clothing such as bras.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Experimental Physiology
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1113/ep092158
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Infrared Thermography in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of female breast surface area on cutaneous thermal sensation, wetness perception and epidermal properties

Silvia Caggiari, Hannah Blount, Peter R. Worsley, Davide Filingeri et al.
3 citations
Experimental Physiology
Infrared Thermography in Medicine
1.21
article

The effect of female breast surface area on cutaneous thermal sensation, wetness perception and epidermal properties

Silvia Caggiari, Hannah Blount, Peter R. Worsley, Davide Filingeri, Alessandro Valenza, Jade Ward
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Female development includes significant size changes across the breast. Yet, whether differences in breast surface area (BrSA) modify breast sensitivity to warm, cold and wetness, and the associated epidermal properties (skin thickness and surface roughness) remain unclear. We investigated the relationship between BrSA and thermal and wetness perception, as well as epidermal properties, in 21 females (28 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$\ \pm $</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> 10 years) of varying breast sizes (BrSA range: 147-502 cm<sup>2</sup>), at multiple breast sites (i.e., nipple, above and below the nipple, and bra triangle). Associations between BrSA and the perceptual and epidermal variables were determined via correlation analyses. Differences across test sites were assessed by repeated-measures ANOVA. Our results did not support the hypothesis that larger breasts present reduced thermal and wetness sensitivity, except for the above nipple site, which presented reduced warm sensitivity with increasing BrSA (r = -0.61, P = 0.003). We also found a heterogeneous distribution of cold, but not warm or wetness, sensitivity across the breast, with the above nipple site presenting lower cold sensitivity than any other site (P < 0.015). Our findings did not indicate any association between BrSA and epidermal properties (thickness and roughness), nor any site-dependent variation in these anatomical parameters (P > 0.15). We conclude that, while some skin-site (i.e., above the nipple) and perceptual modality-dependent (i.e., warm sensitivity) differences were observed, BrSA-dependent variations in thermal and wetness sensitivity were not a generalised feature of the skin covering the breast. These observations advance our fundamental understanding of breast sensory function, and they could inform the design of user-centred clothing such as bras.

Experimental PhysiologyVol. 110(2)
University of Southampton (GB), University of Palermo (IT)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Infrared Thermography in Medicine
1.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.