Retail Investor Protection in the Age of Digital Trading: Regulatory Challenges and Solutions

The research analyzes the regulatory challenges posed by these platforms and to develop effective solutions. The study examines existing regulatory frameworks, such as the Dodd-Frank Act, MiFID II, and the Commodity Exchange Act, as well as market data on trading behaviors and feedback from retail investors and regulatory bodies. Key findings include the identification of significant regulatory gaps, particularly in the areas of anti- money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) requirements, and the lack of clarity in the classification of digital assets as securities or commodities. The significance of these findings lies in their implications for enhancing investor protection and market stability. The broader implications suggest that a more integrated and technology-driven regulatory framework could enhance transparency, prevent market manipulations, and ensure a level playing field for all market participants. This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on digital asset regulation to safeguard retail investors in the digital trading era.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Law and Policy
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.238
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Retail Investor Protection in the Age of Digital Trading: Regulatory Challenges and Solutions

Nizomiddin Kozimov
International Journal of Law and Policy
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
article

Retail Investor Protection in the Age of Digital Trading: Regulatory Challenges and Solutions

Nizomiddin Kozimov
article en

Abstract

The research analyzes the regulatory challenges posed by these platforms and to develop effective solutions. The study examines existing regulatory frameworks, such as the Dodd-Frank Act, MiFID II, and the Commodity Exchange Act, as well as market data on trading behaviors and feedback from retail investors and regulatory bodies. Key findings include the identification of significant regulatory gaps, particularly in the areas of anti- money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) requirements, and the lack of clarity in the classification of digital assets as securities or commodities. The significance of these findings lies in their implications for enhancing investor protection and market stability. The broader implications suggest that a more integrated and technology-driven regulatory framework could enhance transparency, prevent market manipulations, and ensure a level playing field for all market participants. This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on digital asset regulation to safeguard retail investors in the digital trading era.

International Journal of Law and PolicyVol. 2(11)
Tashkent State University of Law (UZ)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Retail Investor Protection in the Age of Digital Trading: Regulatory Challenges and Solutions — Nizomiddin Kozimov · International Journal of Law and Policy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS