Reporting Guidelines for the Early-Phase Clinical Evaluation of Applications Using Extended Reality: RATE-XR Qualitative Study Guideline

The items encompass critical aspects of XR research, from clinical utility and safety to human factors and ethics. By offering a comprehensive checklist for reporting, the RATE-XR guideline facilitates robust assessment and replication of early-stage clinical XR studies. It underscores the need for transparency, patient-centeredness, and balanced evaluation of the applications of XR in health care. By providing an actionable checklist of minimal reporting items, this guideline will facilitate the responsible development and integration of XR technologies into health care and related fields.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/56790
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reporting Guidelines for the Early-Phase Clinical Evaluation of Applications Using Extended Reality: RATE-XR Qualitative Study Guideline

Pietro Cipresso, Albert Rizzo, Jasper van Bommel, O. Joseph Bienvenu et al.
11 citations
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Surgical Simulation and Training
6.30
article

Reporting Guidelines for the Early-Phase Clinical Evaluation of Applications Using Extended Reality: RATE-XR Qualitative Study Guideline

Pietro Cipresso, Albert Rizzo, Jasper van Bommel, O. Joseph Bienvenu, Christian Jung, Johan H. Vlake, Michel E. van Genderen, Giuseppe Riva, Barbara O. Rothbaum, Lotty Hooft, Cristina Botella, Bart F. Geerts, Evert‐Jan Wils, Diederik A M P J Gommers, Brenda K. Wiederhold, Denzel L. Q. Drop
article en
11 citations

Abstract

The items encompass critical aspects of XR research, from clinical utility and safety to human factors and ethics. By offering a comprehensive checklist for reporting, the RATE-XR guideline facilitates robust assessment and replication of early-stage clinical XR studies. It underscores the need for transparency, patient-centeredness, and balanced evaluation of the applications of XR in health care. By providing an actionable checklist of minimal reporting items, this guideline will facilitate the responsible development and integration of XR technologies into health care and related fields.

Journal of Medical Internet ResearchVol. 26
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), Universitat Jaume I (ES), University of Southern California (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Emory University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Erasmus MC (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Creative Technologies (United States) (US), Sint Franciscus Gasthuis (NL), Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (ES), Virtual Reality Medical Center (US), IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IT), Centre de Recherche Nucléaire d’Alger (DZ), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE), University of Turin (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Surgical Simulation and Training
6.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.