Skepticism in al-Ghazālī and Descartes: A Reply to Sami M. Najm

This paper examines Sami M. Najm’s claim that Abū Ḥāmid al-Ghazālī’s (1058-1111) and Descartes’ (1596-1650) skeptical arguments are similar in the following respect: (1) the process of doubt that depends on the distrust of sense perception and reason, (2) the motivation to arrive at certainty, (3) the nature of doubt being methodological and philosophical at the same time, and (4) their solution to doubt. I argue that while Najm’s first and second claim are to the point, Najm’s third and fourth points are not correct. This is because while al-Ghazālī’s skepticism was philosophical, Descartes’s doubt was methodological. It is true that their solution to doubt depends on intuition, but the character of their intuition is different because for al-Ghazālī it is a divine intuition whereas for Descartes it has a mental character. Although Descartes as a theist might ground the intuition on God, this does not change its mental character.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33227/auifd.1258110
Primary Topic
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Skepticism in al-Ghazālī and Descartes: A Reply to Sami M. Najm

Zeynep Betül Taşkın
Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
article

Skepticism in al-Ghazālī and Descartes: A Reply to Sami M. Najm

Zeynep Betül Taşkın
article en

Abstract

This paper examines Sami M. Najm’s claim that Abū Ḥāmid al-Ghazālī’s (1058-1111) and Descartes’ (1596-1650) skeptical arguments are similar in the following respect: (1) the process of doubt that depends on the distrust of sense perception and reason, (2) the motivation to arrive at certainty, (3) the nature of doubt being methodological and philosophical at the same time, and (4) their solution to doubt. I argue that while Najm’s first and second claim are to the point, Najm’s third and fourth points are not correct. This is because while al-Ghazālī’s skepticism was philosophical, Descartes’s doubt was methodological. It is true that their solution to doubt depends on intuition, but the character of their intuition is different because for al-Ghazālī it is a divine intuition whereas for Descartes it has a mental character. Although Descartes as a theist might ground the intuition on God, this does not change its mental character.

Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi DergisiVol. 65(2)
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Skepticism in al-Ghazālī and Descartes: A Reply to Sami M. Najm — Zeynep Betül Taşkın · Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS