Seeking or ignoring ethical certifications in consumer choice

Consumers often encounter, and claim to care about, ethical information concerning the products they purchase. Across three studies, we investigate how the accessibility of this information impacts choice. When consumers must seek out product attribute information, the impact of ethical certifications (Fairtrade and Organic) is diminished relative to other attributes. Both positive and negative framing of certifications increase their impact on choice relative to neutral frames, with negative frames having the strongest effect. However, in contrast to theories of information demand that would predict more willful ignorance of negatively framed content, negative framing has the same impact regardless of information accessibility. Together, our findings suggest that having to seek ethical certification information leads to a small reduction in the use of certifications to guide choice, but that affective framing has a larger impact on the weight placed on certifications in consumer choices regardless of the accessibility of information.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Economics
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108467
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seeking or ignoring ethical certifications in consumer choice

Suzanne Oosterwijk, Joël J. van der Weele, Dianna Amasino, Nicolette J. Sullivan
6 citations
Ecological Economics
Environmental Sustainability in Business
2.63
article

Seeking or ignoring ethical certifications in consumer choice

Suzanne Oosterwijk, Joël J. van der Weele, Dianna Amasino, Nicolette J. Sullivan
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Consumers often encounter, and claim to care about, ethical information concerning the products they purchase. Across three studies, we investigate how the accessibility of this information impacts choice. When consumers must seek out product attribute information, the impact of ethical certifications (Fairtrade and Organic) is diminished relative to other attributes. Both positive and negative framing of certifications increase their impact on choice relative to neutral frames, with negative frames having the strongest effect. However, in contrast to theories of information demand that would predict more willful ignorance of negatively framed content, negative framing has the same impact regardless of information accessibility. Together, our findings suggest that having to seek ethical certification information leads to a small reduction in the use of certifications to guide choice, but that affective framing has a larger impact on the weight placed on certifications in consumer choices regardless of the accessibility of information.

Ecological EconomicsVol. 229
Tilburg University (NL), Tinbergen Institute (NL), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam Brain and Cognition
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
2.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Seeking or ignoring ethical certifications in consumer choice — Suzanne Oosterwijk, Joël J. van der Weele, et al. · Ecological Economics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS